In re: Jason Ryan Stephens, Pamela Renee Stephens, v. James Callaway
This appeal involves a biological father's obligation to support his thirteen year old son. |
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Gretchen Hart, v. Ronald Rick Hart
This is a post-divorce decree proceeding to adjust the amount of periodic alimony. The wife has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court increasing the alimony from $1,000 per month to $1,350 per month. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
James E. Collins v. Department of Correction
The captioned appellant is a prisoner in the punitive custody of the Tennessee Department of Correction. On February 19, 1997, he filed in the Trial Court a petition for declaratory judgment alleging that on November 16, 1996, he filed with the Department a petition for a declaratory order correcting an erroneous entry showing two life sentences which have been merged. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee on relation of Ervin Smith and Ervin Smith Individually, v. L. B. Franklin and Alex Richmond, Cit of Carthage, Tennessee, a municipal corporation, Mayor David Bowman
The plaintiff, Ervin Smith, has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court as to his rights in regard to an alleged public right-of-way on property adjoining plaintiff’s land.
|
Smith | Court of Appeals | |
W. Hudson Connery, Jr. et al., v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation, et al.
Twenty former employees of “HealthTrust,” a ____________ sued HealthTrust and its “successor in interest,” Columbia Health Care Corporation, to recover share of stock (or the value thereof) which they had purchased with earned bonuses and for the value of shares of stock due some of the plaintiffs due them upon discharge. Two of the plaintiffs nonsuited, leaving eighteen. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Helen S. Rogers v. Thomas E. Watts, Jr., - Concurring
This appeal involves another chapter in a lingering, acrimonious dispute between two Nashville lawyers stemming from a failed settlement of a case in federal court. After one of the lawyers abandoned his third-party complaint against the other lawyer for fraudulent misrepresentation, the other lawyer filed a malicious prosecution action in the Circuit Court for Davidson County. When the trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that it was premature, the prevailing lawyer sought Tenn. R. Civ. P. 11 sanctions against the lawyer whose malicious prosecution claim had been dismissed. The trial court declined to grant sanctions, and the lawyer seeking sanctions has appealed. We have determined that the record supports the trial court’s decision not to award sanctions and, therefore, affirm the trial court’s decision. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Boiler Supply Company, Inc., v. Lunn Real Estate Investments
This appeal involves a dispute over the interpretation of a provision allocating the responsibility for paying legal expenses in the event of a default or breach of two leases. The lessee filed suit against the lessor in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking a declaration that the leases had expired and requesting its attorney’s fees in accordance with the provisions of the lease agreements. The trial court granted the lessee’s motion for summary judgment and declared that the leases had expired but denied the lessee’s claim for legal expenses. The lessee has appealed. We have determined that the trial court correctly interpreted the lease agreements and, therefore, affirm the summary judgment. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
James F. Cook, Jr., D/B/A Cook Properties, v. Consolidated Stores Corp., Belz Investco, L.P., Urco, Inc., Union Realty Co. LTD., and South Plaza Co.
This appeal involves a dispute over a real estate commission on four retail properties in Memphis. After a former client leased these properties, a real estate broker filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking a commission from its former client and the lessors of the four properties. The trial court granted the former client’s motion for summary judgment and, following a bench trial, dismissed the broker’s claims against the four lessors. On this appeal, the broker asserts that the trial court erred by granting his former client’s summary judgment motion and that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s dismissal of his claims against the four lessors. We have determined that the trial court properly granted the summary judgment motion and that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s judgment in favor of the four lessors. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
William Michael Anderton v. Evelyn Adele Morgan Anderton
Mr. Anderton has filed a Tenn. R. App. P. 39 petition for rehearing and a Tenn. R. App. P. 14 motion to consider post-judgment facts with regard to his actual gross income in 1996 and 1997. Ms. Anderton has filed a response to these motions. We have determined that Mr. Anderton’s motions should be granted. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Shelley Sackett v. Hal Roseman
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Henry Collier vs. Methodist Hosp., et al
|
Haywood | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9707-CH-00157
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
Bradson Mercantile vs. Joseph Crabtree
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
King vs. King
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Connatser vs. Connatser
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Kellogg Co., vs. TN Comm., et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Fye vs. Kennedy
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Sanjurjo vs. Woods
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9712-CV-00532
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Judd's vs. Muir
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Wilhoite vs. Proffitt
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Moore vs. Feathers
|
Court of Appeals | ||
City of Knox vs. Garuin
|
Court of Appeals | ||
3A01-9801-CH-00034
|
Court of Appeals | ||
3A01-9801-CV-00033
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals |
