Hawkins vs. Sundquist
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Peck vs. Mills et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Williams vs. TDOC
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hogan et al vs. Coyne International Enterprises Corp.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Baker vs Maples
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ruth/Raymond Wells vs. J.C Penny
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Dennis/Cheryl Caire vs. McLemore Food Stores
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Brooks vs Brooks, Jr.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Alexander vs Armentrout, Jr.
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
Spruce vs Spruce
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Clark & Associates Architects, Inc. vs. Lewis
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Edmondson vs. Solomon
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hampton vs. TN Truck Sales
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Sara Evelyn Evans (Young) v. Bobby Hugh Young, D.K. Hailey Wrecking Company, Inc. and Levy Industrial Contractors, Inc.
Intervenors D. K. Hailey WreckingCompany (Hailey Wrecking) and Levy Industrial Contractors, Inc. (Levy Industrial) appeal an order of the trial court requiring them to pay the attorney fees of Plaintiff Sara Evelyn Evans incurred in a proceeding to enforce a judgment obtained by Ms. Evans against Bobby Hugh Young. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the ruling of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Palmer vs. So. Central Correctional Facility Disciplinary Bd.
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
R & E Properties vs Jones
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Woods vs Walldorf
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Memphis Housing Auth. vs. Ramona Stewart
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Bryant vs. McCord, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9805-CH-00258
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9711-CV-00685
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Vernon W. Mauldin v. Tennessee Department of Correction
This appeal involves a state prisoner's efforts to obtain judicial review of the length of his incarceration. The prisoner contends that he is entitled to the benefit of the 1989 Sentencing Reform Act’s lesser sentence for armed robbery rather than the sentence imposed upon him at the time of his conviction in 1985. He also contends he is entitled, as a matter of law, to certain sentence reduction credits. Finally, he contends that, taken together, the downward adjustments of his sentence on the basis of these two contentions would entitle him to be immediately released from custody. He filed a Petition for Declaratory Order with the Department of Correction, and the Department denied him relief. Thereafter, the prisoner filed a pro se "Petition for Judicial Review and/or Petition for a Declaratory Judgment and/or Petition for Common-law Writ of Certiorari" in the Chancery Court of Davidson County. The trial court granted the Department's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12.02(6) of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm the dismissal of the prisoner's petition because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Larry Aubrey Henson, v. Elizabeth Ellen Sorrell - Concurring/Dissenting
I write separately only to indicate disagreement with an inference that may be drawn from the majority opinion. The last sentence in the opinion states that a party such as Henson may recover damages immediately flowing from the wrongful conduct, as in Smith v. Gore, 728 S.W.2d 738 (Tenn. 1987). As noted in the majority opinion, the plaintiff mother in Smith was permitted to recover in a medical malpractice action for damages immediately related to pregnancy and childbirth. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Larry Aubrey Henson v. Elizabeth Ellen Sorrell - Concurring
This case involves allegations of promissory fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, conversion, and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from a woman’s failure to inform her partner that she had stopped taking birth control pills, her subsequent 1In another appeal currently before this Court, Henson appeals the paternity ruling of the juvenile court and challenges the constitutionality of the Tennessee Paternity Statute. 2 pregnancy, and the birth of a child. The plaintiff, Larry Aubrey Henson (Henson), appeals the trial court’s judgment for the defendant, Elizabeth Sorrell (Sorrell), after a trial on the merits. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Katherine Jewell Smith and Jimmie Lewis Smith v. Methodist Hospitals Memphis, Keith G. Anderson, M.D. and The Sutherland Clinic, Inc., F/K/A Cardiology Consultants of Memphis
This interlocutory appeal involves an action by a setling tortfeasor for contribution from an alleged joint tortfeasor. Defendant/cross-plaintiff, Methodist Hospital of Memphis (Methodist), appeals from the order of the trial court dismissing its cross-complaint for contribution against defendant/cross-defendant, Keith G. Anderson, M.D. Apparently, Smith reluctantly included Anderson as a defendant and chose not to prosecute her claim against him. In a Motion in Limine filed April 18, 1997, Smith stated that she would not seek to produce expert testimony in her case against Anderson, and he agreed not to seek a directed verdict because of absence of expert proof.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals |