Mohamud Hirsi Mohamed v. Taxi USA of Tennessee, LLC d/b/a Allied Car Company, et al
M2010-02062-WC-R3-WC
In this case, the plaintiff, a taxi driver injured in a motor vehicle accident, sought workers’ compensation benefits from the taxi company that he alleged employed him. The trial court held that he was an independent contractor and dismissed the complaint. The plaintiff appealed. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Donald P. Harris
Originating Judge:Judge Joe P. Binkley |
Davidson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 02/10/12 | |
James E. Sanders v. Lodgenet Interactive Corporation, et al
M2011-00725-WC-R3-WC
In this workers’ compensation action, the employee alleged that he sustained compensable injuries to his neck and lower back as a result of a March 29, 2007 automobile accident. His employer denied that the employee had any permanent impairment or disability due to the accident. The employer sought an evaluation through the Medical Impairment Registry, but the doctor selected for the evaluation declined to assess impairment because he did not find the employee to be at maximum medical improvement. The employer sought a continuance of the previously-scheduled trial. The trial court denied that motion. The trial court ruled for the employee and awarded disability benefits. On appeal, the employer argues that the trial court erred by denying its motion to continue and by awarding permanent disability benefits. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Donald P. Harris
Originating Judge:Chancellor Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Workers Compensation Panel | 02/10/12 | |
Teton Transportation, Inc. v. Todd White
E2010-02522-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employee alleged that he injured his back at work. His employer denied the claim. While the trial court found that the employee was not a credible witness, it found that he had sustained a compensable injury based upon the testimony of an independent lay witness and the treating physician. The trial court awarded 78% permanent partial disability benefits. The employer has appealed, asserting that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s finding of compensability. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood
Originating Judge:Judge Telford E. Forgety, Jr. |
Blount County | Workers Compensation Panel | 02/07/12 | |
Tammy L. Lee v. Dura Operating Corporation, et al
M2011-00358-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Tammy L. Lee (“Employee”) alleges that she suffered an injury to her cervical spine while she was employed as a factory worker by Dura Operating Corporation (“Employer”). Employer denies that Employee’s cervical spine injury was caused by her employment with Employer. The trial court determined that Employee’s cervical spine condition was a work-related aggravation of her pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The trial court awarded Employee temporary total benefits from November 8, 2007, to February 8, 2008. Finding that Employee had not been able to return to work, the trial court refused to apply the statutory cap and awarded Employee permanent partial disability benefits of 69% to the body as a whole, three times her anatomical impairment rating of 23% to the body as a whole. Finding that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's determination of causation, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge D. J. Alissandratos
Originating Judge:Judge Stella L. Hargrove |
Lawrence County | Workers Compensation Panel | 02/01/12 | |
Marie Akins v. Whirlpool Corporation
M2011-01258-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Marie Akins (“Employee”) alleges that she developed carpal tunnel syndrome in her left wrist while employed as a factory worker by Whirlpool Corporation (“Employer”), prior to the closure of Employer’s plant in August 2008. Employer denies that Employee’s carpal tunnel syndrome in her left wrist was caused by her employment with it. The trial court found that Employee’s left-wrist carpal tunnel syndrome was not caused by her employment with Employer and that Employer therefore is not liable for this injury. Employee has appealed, contending both that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s finding and that Employer is estopped from denying liability based on delay in the diagnosis of Employee’s carpal tunnel syndrome in her left wrist. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge D. J. Alissandratos
Originating Judge:Judge Robert E. Corlew |
Rutherford County | Workers Compensation Panel | 02/01/12 | |
Anita Berkley Rhodes v. Careall, Inc., et al.
W2010-02192-WC-R3-WC
An employee alleged that she sustained a right- and left-side hernia while working. Her employer denied the claim for the left-side hernia. The trial court held that both the right- and left-side hernias were compensable and awarded permanent partial disability benefits. The employer appealed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge Tony A. Childress
Originating Judge:Judge James F. Butler |
Madison County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/20/11 | |
James Terry Johnson v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Inc., d/b/a AT&T, Inc.
W2011-00468-WC-R3-WC
An employee suffered a partial amputation of his left index finger. Compensability of the injury was not contested. At trial, the employee argued that his disability award should be apportioned to the hand. His employer contended that the award should be limited to the index finger. The trial court agreed with the employee and awarded 52% permanent partial disability to the hand. The employer appealed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge Tony A. Childress
Originating Judge:Judge James F. Butler |
Madison County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/20/11 | |
Melissa Hamlin v. Windsor Forestry Tools, Inc., et al.
W2011-00024-WC-R3-WC
The employee injured her back at work and the injury required surgical treatment. The employee returned to work but was later terminated for violation of her employer’s attendance and absenteeism policy. The trial court found the employee did not have a meaningful return to work. The trial court, however, adopted the impairment rating that the employee’s evaluating physician expressed and awarded 90% permanent partial disability benefits, the maximum award permitted by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-241(d). The employer has appealed, contending that the trial court erred by adopting the evaluating physician’s impairment rating, by its use of the six-times multiplier on the basis of facts not in evidence, and by finding that the employee did not have a meaningful return to work. We agree that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s findings concerning employee’s impairment and the six-times multiplier. Accordingly, we modify the award.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Walter C. Kurtz
Originating Judge:Judge George R. Ellis |
Gibson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/20/11 | |
Dewey Gibson, Jr. v. Hidden Mountain Resort, Inc.
E2010-02561-WC-R3-WC
The employee sought workers’ compensation for a back injury which arose out of and in the scope of his employment with the employer. The trial court found that because the employee had a meaningful return to work and was subsequently dismissed for job misconduct, he was limited to benefits of 1.5 times the 20% anatomical impairment rating. The evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s factual findings; the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge:Judge O. Duane Slone |
Sevier County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/12/11 | |
Daniel Boyd Davidson v. Business Personnel Solutions
E2010-02366-WC-R3-WC
The employee, who sustained injuries while removing tree limbs at a job site, filed a claim for workers’ compensation. The employer denied benefits, contending that the injury was the result of the employee’s intoxication and misconduct. While concluding that the employee was not guilty of willful misconduct, the trial court ruled that his intoxication was a proximate cause of the injuries and, therefore, denied the claim. The employee appealed, alleging that the trial court erred by finding that he was intoxicated at the time of his injuries and that the intoxication was the proximate cause. This appeal was referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6- 225(e)(3) and Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. Because the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s finding that the employee was intoxicated and his intoxication proximately caused his injuries, the judgment is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge:Judge Thomas J. Seeley, Jr. |
Washington County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/12/11 | |
Robert Bright v. Shoun Trucking Company, Inc.
E2011-00542-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employee, a truck driver, filed suit for benefits, alleging that he developed bilateral rotator cuff tears and carpal tunnel syndrome as a result of his job responsibilities. His employer contended that his injuries were not related to his employment. At the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court found in favor of the employee and awarded 50% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. The employer has appealed, contending that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s findings (1) that the injuries arose out of and in the course of employment, and (2) that five times the medical impairment was appropriate under the circumstances. Because the evidence does not preponderate against the findings of the trial judge, the judgment is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Justice Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge:Judge E. G. Moody |
Sullivan County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/07/11 | |
David Kirby v. Memphis Jewish Nursing Home
W2010-02261-WC-R3-WC
An employee sustained a compensable injury to his shoulder. While he was recovering from surgery, he reinjured his shoulder when his dog pulled his arm while he was holding the dog by its collar. The trial court found that the reinjury was a direct and natural result of the earlier compensable injury and that the reinjury caused an increase in impairment. The employer has appealed, contending that the trial court incorrectly applied the intervening injury rule and incorrectly adopted the evaluating physician’s impairment. We affirm as to the reinjury but conclude that the trial court erroneously based its award upon an incorrect impairment rating, and we modify the judgment accordingly.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Walter C. Kurtz
Originating Judge:Chancellor James F. Butler |
Chester County | Workers Compensation Panel | 12/01/11 | |
Judy Kilburn ex rel Estate of Charles Kilburn v. Granite State Insurance Company et al.
M2011-00011-WC-R3-WC
This workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employee was seriously injured in the course of his employment in an automobile accident in November 2008. He suffered fractures of his neck and back and underwent a surgical fusion of his neck. Over the course of the next year, he suffered severe pain and was eventually referred to a pain management physician, who prescribed oxycodone. He filed suit against his employer for workers’ compensation benefits. He died in January of 2010 of an accidental overdose of oxycodone over 14 months after his injuries. His widow was substituted as plaintiff in his workers’ compensation suit and filed a motion to amend the complaint to allege that his death was related to his work injury and that she was entitled to death benefits. The employer opposed the motion to amend, contending the death was not compensable because it was not the “direct and natural result of a compensable injury” but rather, the result of an intervening cause, i.e., the employee’s negligence in consuming an overdose of medicine. The trial court denied the motion to amend. The parties entered into a series of stipulations concerning the remaining issues in the case, and judgment was entered. The widow has appealed, contending that the trial court erred in denying her motion to amend the complaint. We agree, reverse the judgment, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Chancellor Robbie Beal |
Williamson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 11/30/11 | |
Judy Kilburn ex rel Estate of Charles Kilburn v. Granite State Insurance Company, et al
M2011-00011-WC-R3-WC
This workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employee was seriously injured in the course of his employment in an automobile accident in November 2008. He suffered fractures of his neck and back and underwent a surgical fusion of his neck. Over the course of the next year, he suffered severe pain and was eventually referred to a pain management physician, who prescribed oxycodone. He filed suit against his employer for workers’ compensation benefits. He died in January of 2010 of an accidental overdose of oxycodone over 14 months after his injuries. His widow was substituted as plaintiff in his workers’ compensation suit and filed a motion to amend the complaint to allege that his death was related to his work injury and that she was entitled to death benefits. The employer opposed the motion to amend, contending the death was not compensable because it was not the "direct and natural result of a compensable injury" but rather, the result of an intervening cause, i.e., the employee’s negligence in consuming an overdose of medicine. The trial court denied the motion to amend. The parties entered into a series of stipulations concerning the remaining issues in the case, and judgment was entered. The widow has appealed, contending that the trial court erred in denying her motion to amend the complaint. We agree, reverse the judgment, and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings
Authoring Judge: Special Judge E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Chancellor Robbie Beal |
Williamson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 11/30/11 | |
Ceildeck Corporation v. Herbert Ivey
M2011-00096-WC-R3-WC
This case involves a race to the courthouse after a Benefit Review Conference ("BRC"). The employee, a Dickson County resident, was allegedly injured in Davidson County during the course and scope of his employment. The employee and his employer unsuccessfully attempted to settle the employee’s claim at a BRC held on October 11, 2010; an impasse was declared at 10:27:19 a.m. Employee’s complaint was filed in the Chancery Court of Dickson County at 10:27 a.m. Employer’s complaint was filed in the Chancery Court of Davidson County at 10:28 a.m. The employee filed a motion to dismiss the employer’s Davidson County complaint based on the doctrine of prior suit pending. The trial court granted the motion, and the employer appealed.We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge:Judge Ellen Hobbs Lyle |
Davidson County | Workers Compensation Panel | 11/15/11 | |
Shannon Majors v. Randstad Inhouse Services, L.P., et al
M2010-01975-SC-WCM-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employee was operating a torque gun which jerked and twisted her right hand while at work. She contended that her injury extended into her arm. Her employer agreed the injury was compensable but argued that the injury was limited to her index finger. The trial court found the injury was to the arm and awarded 70% permanent partial disability to that member. On appeal, her employer argues that the trial court erred by apportioning the award to the arm, that the amount of the award is excessive, and that the trial court erred by awarding certain discretionary costs. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Judge Jeffrey F. Stewart |
Franklin County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/19/11 | |
Michael A. Parish v. Highland Park Baptist Church, et al.
E2010-01977-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Employee was injured when he was thrown from a horse. He alleged that the injury arose in the course and scope of his employment. His Employer contended that the Employee was engaged in a purely private activity; therefore, the injury was not compensable. The trial court denied the claim. On appeal, the Employee contends that the trial court erred by finding his injury was not related to his employment. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge Jerri S. Bryant
Originating Judge:Chancellor W. Frank Brown |
Hamilton County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/18/11 | |
Sterling Edward Hubbard v. Sherman-Dixie Concrete Industries, Inc., et al
E2010-02219-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51 and Tennessee Code Annotated Section 50-6- 225(e)(3), this appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Panel. In this instance, an employee was injured when he tripped and fell over boxes while loading a truck. The employer, who contended that the injury was an aggravation of a pre-existing condition, requested two independent medical evaluations, the second of which the employee refused to attend. The trial court denied the employer’s motion to compel the second evaluation and, ultimately, awarded workers’ compensation benefits. In this appeal, the employer contends that the trial court erred by failing to compel a second evaluation, by awarding benefits to the employee, and by failing to apportion liability to the Second Injury Fund. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Justice Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge:Chancellor W. Frank Brown |
Hamilton County | Workers Compensation Panel | 10/18/11 | |
Sean L. Johnson v. Randstad North America, L.P. and Ace American Insurance Company
M2010-01562-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employee suffered an episode of serious breathing difficulty after work while at home. He was transported by ambulance to a hospital where an emergency tracheotomy was performed to allow him to breathe. He alleged that this episode was caused by exposure to airborne contaminants in his workplace. His employer denied the claim. The trial court found that the employee had sustained a compensable injury and awarded permanent total disability benefits. The employer has appealed, contending that the trial court erred by finding that employee had a compensable injury, and by finding him to be permanently and totally disabled. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Special Judge E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Judge Jim T. Hamilton |
Lawrence County | Workers Compensation Panel | 09/08/11 | |
Naomi Jewell Kelley v. Union Carbide Corporation
M2010-01563-WC-R3-WC
This case involves a claim for workers’ compensation benefits by the dependent spouse of a deceased employee. The decedent was exposed to asbestos in the course of his employment and contracted asbestosis as a result. His claim for benefits was settled in 1991. He died in December 2007, and his widow filed this action seeking death benefits under the workers’ compensation law. The trial court awarded benefits, and the employer has appealed, contending that the widow’s claim was barred by the terms of the 1991 settlement. The widow contends that the trial court incorrectly set the rate at which benefits are to be paid. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Donald P. Harris
Originating Judge:Judge Robert L. Jones |
Maury County | Workers Compensation Panel | 09/08/11 | |
Maxine Watley v. Whirlpool Corporation and Sue Ann Head, Administrator, Second Injury Fund
M2010-02125-WC-R3-WC
In this workers’ compensation case, the employee injured her lower back at work in May 2006. She received medical treatment for a short period of time and was then released by her doctor. In July 2007, she consulted a neurosurgeon for continuing lower back pain. Around the same time, she accepted a voluntary layoff from her employer, then retired. She later had two surgeries on her lower back: a discectomy in October 2007, and a fusion in April 2008. She filed this action, alleging that the surgeries and resulting disability were caused by her employment. Her employer denied the claim. The trial court found that the October 2007 surgery was caused by her May 2006 injury, but the April 2008 surgery was not. It further found that her award of permanent disability benefits was “capped” at one and one-half times her anatomical impairment due to her voluntary retirement. Her employer has appealed, contending that the trial court erred by finding her claim was not barred by the statute of limitations, and by using an incorrect impairment rating as the basis of its award. Employee contends that the trial court erred by failing to find that she was permanently and totally disabled. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Donald P. Harris
Originating Judge:Judge Royce Taylor |
Rutherford County | Workers Compensation Panel | 09/08/11 | |
Paul E. Kennedy v. Lakeway Auto Sales, Inc.
E2010-02422-WC-R3-WC
When the employer refused to provide another panel of physicians following the employee’s negative drug screen result, the employee filed a motion to compel medical treatment. The trial court ordered the employer to provide a panel of three doctors for pain treatment and granted the employee’s request for attorney’s fees. The Supreme Court referred the employer’s appeal to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-225(e)(3) (2008) and Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed and the cause is remanded for modification of the trial court’s order.
Authoring Judge: Justice Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge:Judge Kindall T. Lawson |
Hamblen County | Workers Compensation Panel | 08/31/11 | |
Cherokee Insurance Company, Inc. v. Ralph McNabb
E2010-02348-WC-R3-WC
Pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51, this workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for a hearing and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Ralph McNabb (“Employee”) sustained a right rotator cuff tear as the result of a motor vehicle collision while employed as a truck driver by Everhart Transportation (“Employer”). Employer was insured for workers’ compensation by Cherokee Insurance Company, Inc. (“Insurer”). Employee underwent surgical repair of his right rotator cuff and was returned by Employer to a different, part- ime position. Employee suffered a recurrent rotator cuff tear and thereafter retired. It is undisputed that Employee was not returned to employment at the same or greater wage than prior to his injury. Employee’s treating physician and his evaluating physician both assigned him an anatomical impairment rating of 10% to the body as a whole, but with different restrictions. The trial court awarded 60% permanent partial disability (“PPD”) to the body as a whole. Insurer has appealed, asserting that the award was excessive. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood
Originating Judge:Chancellor Thomas R. Frierson, II |
Greene County | Workers Compensation Panel | 08/29/11 | |
Michael Schwamb v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
M2010-01643-WC-R3-WC
In this workers’ compensation case, the employee had a compensable back injury in 2008. His doctor assigned 19% permanent anatomical impairment for the injury, based upon the Sixth Edition of the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. He had previously settled a claim for a compensable back injury in 1996. That injury resulted in a 15% permanent impairment according to the Fourth Edition of the Guides, then in effect. Based upon those ratings, the treating physician for the 2008 injury apportioned 4% of the total 19% impairment to the more recent injury. An evaluating physician used the Sixth Edition to rate both injuries and opined that the impairment for the 2008 injury was 13% to the body as a whole. The trial court adopted the evaluating physician’s rating and based its award of permanent disability benefits on it. The employer has appealed,arguing that the trial court erred by adopting the evaluating physician’s rating. We affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Donald P. Harris
Originating Judge:Judge Vanessa A. Jackson |
Coffee County | Workers Compensation Panel | 08/09/11 | |
James E. Stem v. Thompson Services, Inc., et al
M2010-01566-WC-R3-WC
This workers’ compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(3)(3) (2008) for a hearing and report of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The appeal involves a dispute regarding the type and amount of temporary benefits an employee working two jobs is entitled to following an injury at one of the employee’s jobs. After sustaining a work-related injury that required the employee to discontinue one but not both of his jobs, the employee filed suit in the Circuit Court for Rutherford County. After the trial court awarded temporary total disability benefits, the employer appealed and asserted that the employee was not entitled to temporary total disability benefits because he continued to work at his second job. We conclude that the employee is entitled to temporary partial, rather than temporary total, disability benefits and remand the case to the trial court to determine the amount of these benefits.
Authoring Judge: Justice William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Robert G. Crigler |
Rutherford County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/26/11 |