Jamesena White et al vs. The City of Knoxville, et al
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State vs. Ronnie Mason
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Carlos Mathis
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State vs. Ricky W. McElhaney
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Joseph White
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Guy William Rush
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William H. Horton vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Harold Woodroof
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Donald K. Moore, Jr.
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kenneth Johnson
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Frank Barnard vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Delbert G. Mosher
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Tommy Lee Kelley vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State v. Erica Hartwell
|
Tipton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Cardenas
|
Chester | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David E. Hancock
|
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9808-CR-00322
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Alvin L. Smith, Jr. vs. State
|
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Daniel L. Sanders vs. State
|
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Richard Waline vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James E. Frazier
|
Cannon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jason Kennedy Frazier
|
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Danny Lynn Porter
|
Roane | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Proffitt
|
Cumberland | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. James Tyrone Harbison
The defendant, James Tyrone Harbison, was convicted in 1997 of aggravated assault and sentenced as a Range III persistent offender to fourteen years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-102. In this appeal, the defendant presents the following issues: (1) Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s finding of “serious bodily injury” as an aggravating factor of the defendant’s convicted offense; (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in permitting testimony that the defendant had been released from prison immediately preceeding the instant offense; (3) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on reckless endangerment as a lesser offense; (4) whether the defendant’s sentence is excessive; and (5) whether the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as a Range III persistent offender. We AFFIRM the judgment from the trial court. |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals |