State vs. Peter Ross
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Mark Bryan
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
W1999-02113-CCA-R3-CD
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9901-CR-00044
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9901-CR-00121
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9807-CC-00257
|
Jefferson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Stacy Allen Bullard
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Tony Martin
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Vincent Sims
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Vincent Sims
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pamela Hopper
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kelly Haynes
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Matthew Lawrence
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Darrell Baker
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Rudy Wendell Myers vs. State
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jeffery Ray Jennings
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Hankins
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9803-CR-00118
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
E1999-01465-CCA-R3CD
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kawaski Taylor
|
Gibson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jerry Travis
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
M1998-00118-CCA-R3-CD
|
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Henry DeQuan Rhodes
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jeffrey Eugene Wright, a.k.a Jeffrey Eugene Arnell
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Khanh V. Le
On November 10, 1997, the appellant, Khanh V. Le, was convicted by a jury in the Shelby County Criminal Court of first degree murder. The trial court sentenced the appellant to life imprisonment in the Tennessee Department of Correction. In this appeal as of right, the appellant presents the following issues for our review: (I) Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the appellant’s conviction of first degree murder; (II) Whether the trial court erred by refusing to charge any lesser included offenses to first degree murder; (III) Whether the trial court erred by denying the appellant’s motion to suppress identification testimony. Following a review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals |