State of Tennessee vs. Ronald Lockhart
Defendant Ronald Lockhart appeals as of right from his conviction by a Hamblen County jury of driving under the influence, third offense, and driving with a revoked license. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction of driving under the influence. After a careful review of the record, we find no error, and affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Mickey Jeffries
The defendant, Mickey Jeffries, was convicted of felony murder. The trial court imposed a life sentence. In this appeal of right, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Robert Emmet Dunlap, Jr.
The defendant, Robert Emmet Dunlap, Jr., was convicted on three counts of the sale of cocaine, a Schedule II controlled substance. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-417(a)(3). Fines totaled $225,000.00. The trial court imposed sentences of ten years on each count to be served concurrently with each other but consecutively to a prior sentence for a conviction in Montgomery County. |
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Kenneth Weems vs. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Kenneth Weems, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. The single issue presented for review is whether the petitioner was denied the effective assistance of counsel for having failed to timely file an interlocutory appeal of an order denying the suppression of certain of the state's evidence. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Rochelle Andre Triplett
Appellant, Rochelle Andre Triplett, pled guilty to aggravated assault, simple assault, criminal impersonation, and possession of drug paraphernalia in March 1998. He received an effective three-year sentence and was placed on probation. In June 1998, his probation officer filed a probation violation warrant alleging failure to report and failure to pay fines and costs. The trial court conducted a full revocation hearing, found appellant in violation and revoked his probation. Appellant challenges that revocation. We AFFIRM. |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Franklin Dan Rickman
Petitioner was convicted of theft and felony escape, and brought a post-conviction proceeding challenging his convictions. The petition was denied by the trial court. We affirm the dismissal of the petition. |
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Lawrence Tucker v. State of Tennessee
This case came to be heard on the motion of the State of Tennessee for an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. In November 1997, the petitioner pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. Pursuant to his plea agreement, he was sentenced to one year at thirty percent (30%), with this sentence to be served consecutively to a sentence from Texas. The petitioner was apparently returned to Texas following his guilty plea, but Tennessee authorities have lodged a detainer against him providing for his return to serve his Tennessee sentence upon completion of his Texas sentence. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Freddie Lee Cunningham
The defendant, Freddie Lee Cunningham, pled guilty to the possession of more than .5 gram of crack cocaine with the intent to manufacture, deliver, or sell, a Class B felony. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-417(a)(4), (c)(1). The trial court imposed a Range I sentence of eight years to be served in the Department of Correction. Fines totaled $2,000.00. |
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Johnnie Lamont Dalton v. State of Tennessee
The appellant, Johnnie Lamont Dalton, appeals the Davidson County Criminal Court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. On May 5, 1997, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to murder second degree during the voir dire of a jury, wherein he was charged with the offense of murder first degree. The petitioner, collaterally, attacks his guilty plea and conviction for murder second degree upon the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. More specifically, he contends that trial counsel failed to (a) adequately investigate and prepare for trial; (b) failed to interview and subpoena state witnesses; and (c) failed to subpoena potential witnesses, including one witness who the defendant contends would have established that the defendant was not the murderer. The petitioner asserts that were it not for the above actions, he would not have pled guilty on the mistaken advice of counsel. After a review of the record, we AFFIRM the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Gregory James Harper vs. State
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9808-CR-00325
|
Overton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9902-CC-00055
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ricky Lee Turner
|
Rhea | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9801-CR-00021
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9903-CC-00097
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9904-CC-00164
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Gary William Holt vs. State
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Opinion Believes It To Be. In State v. Green, 985 S.W.2D 591, 615-16 (Tenn. Crim. App.
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9810-CR-00372
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Timothy Jason Solomon
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9902-CR-00084
|
Hancock | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9903-CR-00093
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9905-CC-00201
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9810-CR-00363
|
Washington | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9810-CR-00377
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals |
