State vs. Haycraft
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Chastain
|
Polk | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Donald Gene Brooks
The defendant, Donald Gene Brooks, stands convicted of first degree felony murder, especially aggravated robbery, theft of property valued over $1,000, and setting fire to personal property, all related to the robbery and killing of Joseph J. Wisniewski. He received his convictions following a jury trial in the Montgomery County Criminal Court. Brooks is incarcerated in the Department of Correction serving his effective sentence of life plus 27 years. In this direct appeal, Brooks challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence and the length of sentence imposed. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Devon Welles
The Defendant, Devon Wells, appeals his convictions of two counts of sale of a Schedule II controlled substan ce following a jury trial in the Lincoln County Circu it Court. The trial court sentenced him as a Range II Multiple Offender to two consecutive sentences of nine (9) and seven (7) years. He was also fined a total of $100,000 for the two convictions. In this appeal, Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the sentence imposed was excessive and contrary to law. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Anthony P. Geanes
The Defendant, Anthony P. Geanes, appeals as of right from his conviction in the Circuit Court of Hardeman County. Following a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of delivery of a Schedule II con trolled substance. He was sentenced to serve fifteen (15) years as a Range II Offender. In this appeal, Defendant challenges the sufficien cy of the evidence and the length of his sentence. We affirm the judgm ent of the trial court. |
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Amanda Treece
Following an evidentiary hearing, the Circuit Court of Chester County entered an order which revoked Defendant’s probation and ordered her to serve her original sentence of four (4) years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The Defendant, Amanda Treece, appeals from that action of the trial court. W hile Defendant does not challenge the revocation of probation, she argues in her sole issue on appeal that the trial court erred by requiring her to serve her entire sentence by incarceration in the Department of Correction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Chester | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Eric Florence
The defendant, Eric M. Florence, entered pleas of guilt in the General Sessions Court of Benton County to possession of marijuana and unlawful possession of alcohol. He was sentenced to eleven months and twenty-nine days in the county jail; all but two days were suspended on each count. The sentences were to be concurrently served. The defendant incurred additional charges and his probation was revoked. He served a portion of his general sessions sentence and then moved the court to suspend the remainder. The general sessions court denied the motion. The defendant appealed to the circuit court. That court affirmed the decision of the general sessions court. |
Benton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Lemont E. Blair
The appellant, Lemont E. Blair, appeals as of right the Knox County Criminal Court’s revocation of his community corrections sentence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals. |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. William Waylon Jackson, a.k.a. Bill Jackson
The defendant, William Waylon Jackson, was convicted by a Decatur County jury of three (3) counts of the sale of marijuana over one-half (½) ounce, Class E felonies. The trial court sentenced him as a Range II offender to concurrent terms of three (3) years for each count and denied alternative sentencing. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment as it violated the mandatory joinder provision of Tenn. R. Crim. P. 8(a). He further argues that the trial court imposed excessive sentences and improperly denied alternative sentencing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Decatur | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Walter Ellison
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Charles E. Jones v. State of Tennessee
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Jordan
|
Giles | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Keith Wooten vs. State
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pierson
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Sutton
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9703-CR-00091
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9704-CC-00126
|
Wayne | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
I Concur In The Results In This Case. In State v. Milton S. Jones, Jr., No.
|
Wayne | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Virginia Gann
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
O1C01-9703-CC-00112
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Shirley
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Shirley
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Welch vs. State
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Dukes & Dukes vs. State
|
Union | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Hodge
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals |
