COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS

03C01-9511-CR-00350
03C01-9511-CR-00350
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner

03C01-9508-CC-00217
03C01-9508-CC-00217
Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb

03C01-9506-CR-00156
03C01-9506-CR-00156
Trial Court Judge: Ray L. Jenkins

03C01-9509-CR-00273
03C01-9509-CR-00273
Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer

01C01-9508-CC-00248
01C01-9508-CC-00248
Trial Court Judge: Cornelia A. Clark

01C01-9508-CC-00284
01C01-9508-CC-00284
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins

01C01-9411-CC-00375
01C01-9411-CC-00375
Trial Court Judge: Rex Henry Ogle

01C01-9506-CC-00169
01C01-9506-CC-00169

01C01-9402-CR-00056
01C01-9402-CR-00056
Trial Court Judge: Thomas H. Shriver

01C01-9506-CR-00176
01C01-9506-CR-00176

Cyril v. Fraser
01C01-9511-CR-00360
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond

01C01-9511-CR-00363
01C01-9511-CR-00363

01C01-9509-CR-00314
01C01-9509-CR-00314
Trial Court Judge: William M. Barker

01C01-9509-CR-00315
01C01-9509-CR-00315

03C01-9512-CC-00380
03C01-9512-CC-00380

03C01-9601-CR-00047
03C01-9601-CR-00047
Trial Court Judge: Russell C. Hinson

03C01-9511-CC-00369
03C01-9511-CC-00369

02C01-9409-CR-00208
02C01-9409-CR-00208
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey

02C01-9510-CC-00300
02C01-9510-CC-00300
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

02C01-9502-CC-00046
02C01-9502-CC-00046
Trial Court Judge: Joe G. Riley. Jr.

01C01-9507-CR-00231
01C01-9507-CR-00231
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman

Cyril v. Fraser
01C01-9507-CC-00236

01C01-9510-CC-00322
01C01-9510-CC-00322

03C01-9510-CR-00309
03C01-9510-CR-00309
Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

State of Tennessee vs. Phillip Craig Mangrum
01C01-9508-CR-00259
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jane W. Wheatcraft

The appellant, Phillip Mangrum, pled guilty in the Criminal Court of Sumner County to aggravated burglary, a class C felony. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-403 (1991). The trial court sentenced the appellant as a multiple offender within range II to eight years incarceration in the Department of Correction. The appellant appeals from this sentence, contending, in essence, that (1) the appellant’s status as a multiple offender is not supported by the record; (2) the State’s notice of enhanced sentencing was inadequate under the Sentencing Act and Tenn. R. Crim. P. 12.3; and (2) his sentence is excessive.