X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Morgan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9903-CR-
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9903-CR-
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Elsea, Jr.
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. J.D. Edward Ealey
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9812-CC-0441
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Lee Hurst
|
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Herman Holston v. State of Tennessee
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Mark Griffis vs. State
|
Roane | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Marsha Trentham
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William Logan vs. State
|
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Eric Larez
The defendant, Eric Larez, appeals his convictions in the Sullivan County Criminal Court on two counts of the sale of marijuana over one-half ounce and one count of the sale of over one-half gram of cocaine. He was sentenced as a Range I offender to two years confinement for each of the counts involving marijuana and nine years in that involving cocaine, all sentences to be served concurrently. He has filed a timely appeal of these convictions, alleging as error:
Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Charles Edward Evans, Alias
The appellant, Charles Edward Evans, appeals the Knox County Criminal Court’s order revoking his probation. In 1996, the appellant was convicted of one (1) count of selling less than 0.5 grams of cocaine and sentenced to eight (8) years as a Range II offender. The appellant was placed on probation by the Tennessee Department of Correction in February 1998. Subsequently, the state filed a petition to revoke the appellant’s probation, and after an evidentiary hearing, the trial court revoked the appellant’s probation. On appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in revoking probation. After a review of the record before this Court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals. |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ricio Conner
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Brian Williamson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Bailey Agnew
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Phillip Howell
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. George Pilkinton
|
Giles | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Marshall Simon
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jimmy Matlock
|
McNairy | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael A. Braswell
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cyrus Wilson vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals |