Samuel S. Minton vs. State
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Eddie Howard vs. State
|
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Rickie Alan Osborne
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Tommy Nunley
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Billy Harris
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Timothy Inman
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Robert Burton
|
Weakley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Luther White
|
Chester | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Gary Carr
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Clem Henry
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Leslie R. Holt
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Hayes
|
Marshall | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9708-CR-00329
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Charles Haynes vs. State
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jerry E. Biggs vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Delivetrick Blocker
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Rema Morgan
|
Campbell | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Brian Thomas Kluever
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
A.D. Barker vs. State of Tennessee
The Petition er, A. D . Barke r, appe als the order o f the Se vier County Circuit Court dismissing his petition fo r post-conviction relief. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Tyrone Chalmers
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Donald Culbreath & Genna McCallie
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Thomas Boone
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Devon Crawford
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Francesca Turner & Charles Taylor
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Demetrius Robinson
On October 15, 1997, the defendant was convicted of delivering cocaine and he was sentenced to serve four years in the penitentiary. The defendant was tried along with a co-defendant Reggie Barton. In the course of the trial, statements made by Barton implicated the defendant. The defendant raises the following issues: 1. Whether the defendant’s Motion To Sever the trial should have been granted? 2. Whether the co-defendant’s statement to the confidential informant should have been excluded or redacted? We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals |