State vs. Terrell Cowans
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Danny Horn
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Palmer
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Timothy Redd
|
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Volz
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Moss
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jerry Cooper
|
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jerry Cooper
|
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Carlos Coman
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Ware
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Gary Mayes vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Robbie James
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9612-CC-00517
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9612-CC-00519
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Stat e vs. Michael Moore
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Hassell
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Nassel Brown
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Clifton Epps
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Terry Phelps vs. State
|
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Walton
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Orlando Hobson
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Patrick v. Kelfalla,
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9510-CR-00347
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State of Tennessee vs. Dorothy Sheldon - Concurring
I concur in the result reached by the majority. I write separately however because I have reached the conclusion that venue is proper in this case through a somewhat different rationale than that expressed in the majority opinion. |
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Dorothy Sheldon
The appellant, Dorothy Sheldon, was convicted by a jury of forgery. She was sentenced as a Range III, persistent offender to four years incarceration. She appeals raising the following issues for our review: 1. Whether the evidence is sufficient to support her conviction; 2. Whether the evidence is sufficient to establish venue in Dickson County; and 3. Whether the manner of service of her sentence is proper. Upon review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment of conviction and sentence. |
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals |