State of Tennessee v. Peter Allen Ross - Dissenting

Case Number
W1999-00972-SC-R11-CD

For denying that a key to a hotel room belonged to him, the defendant has been stripped of
his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The majority
imposes this harsh result even in the face of obvious and undisputed evidence that the subject
premises were under the defendant’s exclusive and private control. Because I am unable to agree
that a refusal to incriminate one’s self in response to police inquiries should result in a loss of Fourth Amendment rights, I respectfully dissent.

Authoring Judge
Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge Charles C. Mcginley
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Peter Allen Ross - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version