Kevin Demers v. Walter Whittenburg

Case Number
M2003-00184-COA-R3-CV

This case involves two Rule 12.02(6) motions to dismiss converted to motions for summary judgment through the filing of additional affidavits with Plaintiff’s response to these motions. Although the trial court dismissed all claims against Defendants for failure to state a claim under Rule 12.02(6), we must review the evidence using a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment standard. Plaintiff alleged numerous business torts, conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and defamation in this action against Defendants. However, Plaintiff failed to provide any evidence from which a jury could return a verdict in favor of Plaintiff on any count alleged. The trial court also granted Rule 11 sanctions against Plaintiff. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, but on summary judgment grounds.

Authoring Judge
Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge
Judge John H. Gasaway, III
Case Name
Kevin Demers v. Walter Whittenburg
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
DemersK.pdf92.45 KB