| 
                      Baxter Neal Helson, v. Leticia Finley Cyrus
                       The issues in this appeal involve the lower court's order incorporating (1) a provision that a nine-year-old child did not have to visit with his father against this (the child's) wishes and (2) a provision that the mother was to arrange a private phone call between the child and his father once a week. We revers the order with respect to visitation. Otherwise we affirm. | Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Throneberry Properties et al vs. Allen
                       | Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Rhoden vs. Dept. of Correction
                       | Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Sarah v. Peltz,
                       | Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Wallace vs. Wallace
                       | Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Metric Partners Growth Suite Investors vs. Nashville Lodging
                       | Court of Appeals | ||
| 
                      01A01-9712-CH-00743
                       | Pickett | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Turner vs. Donal Campbell et al
                       | Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Williams vs. Williams
                       | Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Logan vs. Logan
                       | Court of Appeals | ||
| 
                      Logan vs. Logan
                       | Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Lucy L. Bond v. Belle Meade Fund Partners v. Belle Meade Fund Partners, Branch Property L.P., Branch Property, Ltd. Partnership
                       The plaintiff sued for injury suffered when she stepped into a hole in the asphalt surface of a parking lot provided for customers of Kroger Company. Kroger was dismissed by nonsuit, and the remaining defendants were dismissed by summary judgment. Plaintiff appealed and presented the following issue: I. Whether a genuine issue of material fact has been raised by the plaintiff/appellant, so as to warrant this cause to be tried on its merits. | Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      Garrard vs. Metropolitan Gov't.
                       | Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. Taurys Walls
                       | Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      Joel Summers vs. Lisa Summers
                       | Carroll | Court of Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. Griffis
                       | Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
| 
                      Evid., And Mcdaniel v. Csx Transportation, Inc., 955 S.W.2D 257 (Tenn. 1997). The
                       | Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. Bidwell
                       | Rhea | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      Collier vs. State
                       | Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. George Kelly
                       | Warren | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. Johnny Davidson
                       | Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. Eddie Coley
                       | Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. Eddie Coley
                       | Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. Larry Dixon
                       | Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
| 
                      State vs. Danny King
                       | Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals |