Curtis vs. Curtis
01A01-9810-CV-00566
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Kesterson vs. Dept. of Safety
01A01-9805-CH-00256

Wilson vs. Dept. of Corrections
01A01-9806-CH-00302

Doe vs. HCA Health Services of TN
01A01-9806-CV-00306
Trial Court Judge: Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr.

State vs. Robin Dehart
03C01-9807-CC-00234
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Edward T. Kendricks vs. State
03C01-9806-CR-00205

State vs. Melvin Jerome Anderson
03C01-9808-CC-00293
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.

State vs. Tracy Lebron Vick
03C01-9803-CR-00100
Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

State vs. Tracy Lebron Vick
03C01-9803-CR-00100
Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

State vs. Jerry Hayes
02C01-9810-CC-00338
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

State vs. David Hundley
02C01-9810-CC-00313
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree

State vs. David Hundley
W2001-00500-CCA-RM-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree
In this case, the petitioner, David Lee Hundley, filed a petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court dismissed the petition on the basis that it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Our Court reversed and remanded for a determination by the trial court as to whether there was sufficient evidence of Petitioner's prior mental health problems to warrant a tolling of the statute of limitations. David Lee Hundley v. State, No. 02C01-9810-CC-00313, 1999 WL 668723, Weakley County (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, August 26, 1999). The supreme court granted the State's application for permission to appeal pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 11 and remanded the case to this Court for reconsideration in light of State v. Nix, S.W.3d, No. E1999-02715-SC-R11-PC, slip op. (Tenn. Feb. 20, 2001). Upon remand, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State vs. Gerald Schaffer
03C01-9807-CR-00226
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner

Michael Dickerson vs. State
03C01-9808-CC-00306
Trial Court Judge: Ben W. Hooper, II

Victoria Robbins vs. Bill Wolfenbarger, D/B/A Wolf's Motors and Sam Horne
E1999-02012-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
Plaintiff Robbins filed a complaint for damages against Wolfenbarger and Horne, alleging breach of contract, intentional misrepresentation and negligence, per se. On August 26, 1999, an Order of Compromise and Dismissal was entered as to Wolfenbarger individually and d/b/a Wolf Motors. Horne did not file an answer during the time allowed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, and Robbins filed a motion for default judgment on July 9, 1999. Horne wrote a letter to the plaintiff's attorney in response to the complaint and summons, postmarked July 16, 1999. The letter was forwarded to the Clerk of the Court for filing by plaintiff's counsel's letter dated July 30, 1999. On August 27, Robbins' Motion for Default Judgment was heard, but Horne who had notice did not attend. A default judgment was entered against Horne and the Trial Court subsequently overruled Horne's Motion to Set Aside the Default. Horne has appealed. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.

State vs. James Otis Martin
03C01-9803-CR-00103
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner

John Seals vs. James Bowlen, Warden, et al
M1999-00997-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle
Petitioner, a state inmate, filed the underlying pro se petition for a writ of certiorari to challenge the result of a disciplinary proceeding against him. The trial court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim. We reverse the dismissal of all parties except the Department of Correction and affirm the dismissal for failure to state a claim.

Robert Odom v. Mary Odom
M1999-02811-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Allen W. Wallace
This appeal involves a bitter custody dispute over three children between the ages of nine and fourteen. During the divorce proceeding in the Chancery Court for Dickson County, the parties agreed that the mother would have custody of the children and also agreed on visitation arrangements that accommodated the mother's planned move to another state. Several months after the entry of the divorce decree, the father petitioned to change custody and to hold the mother in contempt for interfering with his relationship with the children. During the ensuing three years, the parties traded allegations of sexual and physical abuse of the children and other misconduct. Following a bench trial in December 1998, the trial court found that there had been a material change in the children's circumstances and granted the father custody of the children. On this appeal, the mother asserts that she was denied due process by the trial court's refusal to require the parties and their children to undergo a psychological examination and that the trial court unlawfully delegated its judicial authority to a psychologist who had been counseling the children. We have determined that the mother received an essentially fair hearing on this custody dispute and, therefore, affirm the trial court.

State vs. Bao Nguyon
02C01-9801-CR-00004
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft

State vs. Eric Carter
02C01-9809-CR-00299
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.

Nationsbank, N.A. vs. FormPak, Inc. & Ron Campbell
03A01-9808-CH-00279

Nationsbank, N.A. vs. FormPak, Inc. & Ron Campbell
03A01-9808-CH-00279

William Terry Wyatt vs. Billie Carey
03A01-9809-CV-00307

Saul T. Mallen (Sports-Wear Mills, Inc.) vs. PI, Inc.
03A01-9811-CH-00364

Begley Lumber Company, Inc. vs. Wendell Trammell
03A01-9902-CH-00047