State vs. Reginald Tutton
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Beard
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Cheryl Sudduth
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Sharon Melton In Re: City Bonding Compnay d/b/a A-1 Bonding Company
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Larry Hart
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Underwood
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Mabry
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Larry Torres
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Dinkins
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Darrell Emerson
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
First American National Bank vs. Alexander & Betty Smith
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Larry Englet
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Robert Morris v. Columbia Construction
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Larry Baxter
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Steven Newman
|
Decatur | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Earl Lee
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Shannon Young
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Gregory Jackson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02A01-9709-CV-00206
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Woodrow Wilson vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Offender. This Court Affirmed The Appellant'S Sentences, State v. James T. Fite, No. 89-
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Tommy Blevins vs. State
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Tracy Pitts
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Potter's Home Center, Inc., D/B/A Potter's Home Center, v. Lauren Dale Tucker, and Wilburn R. Viles, Sr., and wife Mildred E. Viles, and the Guaranty Title Company, and First American National Bank
Potter’s Home Center appeals the trial court’s summary judgment which dismissed its suit to enforce a materialman’s lien against Defendants/Appellees Wilburn R. Viles, Sr., and Mildred E. Viles. We affirm the trial court’s judgment based on our conclusion that Potter’s failed to comply with the applicable notice requirements of the mechanics’ and materialmen’s lien statutes. |
Anderson | Court of Appeals |