In the Matter of: K.E.C.D., a child Under the Age of 18 Years
This appeal involves a dispute over the surname of a child born to unmarried parents. The biological father (“Father”) of the minor child, seeks reversal of the juvenile court’s denial of his motion to change the child’s last name. Over the objections of the mother (“Mother”),1 Father sought to change his son’s last name to his own to reflect his paternity. For the following reasons, we vacate and remand.2 |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Barry Stokes and Pamela Stokes v. Torina Arnold
The Chancery Court for Dickson County terminated a mother’s parental rights to three young children and allowed the foster parents to proceed with the adoption of the children. Because we find that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence upon which to base the termination of the mother’s parental rights, we reverse. |
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Carl Scott and Alma Scott, v. Rogers Group, Inc.
This is a case involving breach of contract. Plaintiffs/appellants, Carl Scott and Alma Scott (referred to herein as “the Scotts”) appeal from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to defendant/appellee, Rogers Group, Inc. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ferris E. Watson v. Lynn Rose Watson
This case involves a dispute over custody of two children upon their parents’ divorce. The trial court awarded custody to Lynn Rose Watson (“Mother”) with visitation to Ferris E. Watson (“Father”). Father appeals, claiming he is comparatively the better parent. We affirm the award of custody to Mother. |
Stewart | Court of Appeals | |
Rutherford Co. Bd. of Ed. vs. Rutherford Co. Comm.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02098-C)A-R3-CV
|
Hawkins | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02550-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance vs. Brian Howard, et al
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
William George Baltrip vs. Roy K. Norris, et al . Carolyn Turner vs. Monroe Farmers Cooperative
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Jeffrey L. Lawson v. University of Tennessee
We granted this Rule 9, T.R.A.P., application to determine whether the defendant University of Tennessee (“the University”) can be sued for a violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. We find that it cannot be sued for such violations under the current state of the law. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the University’s motion to dismiss. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02516-COA-R9-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02518-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1998-00745-COA-R3-CV
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
00747-COA-R3-CV
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
02525-COA-R3-CV
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Baker, et al vs. American Paper and Twine Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Advantage Funding Corp. vs. Mid-TN Manufacturing Co.
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Lineberry vs. Ashe
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Woodridge Properties vs. Franco-Ward
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
West vs. West
|
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-00380-COA-R3-
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1999-02263-COA-R3-CV
|
Hamblen | Court of Appeals | |
In This Action F Or Damag Es For Injuries Sustained In a Motor Ve Hicle
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Tommy Lee White vs. Caroldene White
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1998-00349-COA-R3-CV
|
Court of Appeals |