COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

STS/BAC Joint Venture v. The City of Mt. Juliet M2003-00171-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell Trial Court Judge: Charles K. Smith The developer of a planned Wilson County subdivision sought damages for a temporary taking, claiming that the City of Mt. Juliet interfered with the completion of the project by arbitrarily refusing to grant necessary permits. The trial court granted summary judgment to Mt. Juliet, in part on the ground that the statute of limitations had passed on the developer's claim for relief. We affirm.	Wilson	Court of Appeals	05/26/99
Tabor vs. Eakin 03A01-9902-CV-00043	Knox	Court of Appeals	05/26/99
Amy Decker vs. Carroll Academy 02A01-9709-CV-00242 Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn	Carroll	Court of Appeals	05/26/99
Damron vs. Media General et al 01A01-9805-CV-00251 Trial Court Judge: Lee Russell	Lincoln	Court of Appeals	05/25/99
Mason et al vs. Metro Development 01A01-9806-CH-00283 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/25/99
Lautenbach vs. Lautenbach 01A01-9710-CH-00595 Trial Court Judge: Leonard W. Martin	Cheatham	Court of Appeals	05/25/99
Davis vs. Inman, et al 01A01-9706-CH-00254 Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton	Lawrence	Court of Appeals	05/25/99
Forklift Systems vs. Werner Enterprises 01A01-9804-CH-00220 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/25/99
Marcus vs. Marcus 02S01-9804-CH-00036	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/24/99
Estate of Bonnie Spalding 02A01-9807-PB-00183 Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Benham	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/24/99
Haynes vs. Harris 01A01-9810-CV-00518	Hickman	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Farrar vs. Segroves 01A01-9808-CH-00443 Trial Court Judge: Tyrus H. Cobb	Bedford	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Winfree vs. Winfree 01A01-9805-CH-00264 Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.	Warren	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Creswell vs. Creswell 03A01-9804-CH-00151		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Harvey vs. Ford Motor Credit 03A01-9807-CV-00235		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Pait vs. City of Gatlinburg 03A01-9808-CH-00274		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Harjes vs. Russell 03A01-9810-CH-00321	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Debyl vs. Graham 03A01-9901-GS-00015		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Ausbrooks vs. Ausbrooks 01A01-9803-CH-00114 Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell	Williamson	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
) Hon. F Rank v. Will Iams, Iii 03101-9807-CH-00239		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Nancy Knight vs. Henry Knight 02A01-9804-CH-00094	Carroll	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Krista Miller vs. Frederick Miller 02A01-9809-CH-00271 Trial Court Judge: John Walton West	Henry	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Atty. Gen. vs. Elk View Land & Gravel 03A01-9808-CV-00247		Court of Appeals	05/19/99
Bethany Christian Services vs. Jackson 03A01-9810-JV-00345		Court of Appeals	05/19/99
Lee P. Fite, Individually and Derivatively on behalf of H & M Construction Co., Inc. v. Richard L. Fite, C. David Fite, Larry P. Becker, et al 02A01-9710-CH-00266 Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Joe C. Morris This case involves allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud in the inducement of a contract, and violation of the Tennessee Securities Act. The plaintiff asserts that the defendants, his two brothers who are majority shareholders in the family corporation, the corporation, as an alter ego or veil of the majority shareholders, and an officer and director of the corporation, used fraudulent expense and contract-kickback schemes to lower the book value of the corporation’s stock when plaintiff executed an option to sell agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. We reverse and remand.	Madison	Court of Appeals	05/19/99