COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

David Swett, Sr. v. Grace Z. Aleman Swett
M1998-00961-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson
This appeal involves the dissolution of a nine-year marriage. Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Davidson County, the trial court found both parties to be at fault but awarded the divorce to the wife. The court also granted the parties joint custody of their son and divided their property. On this appeal, the wife asserts that the trial court erred by concluding that her conduct contributed to the divorce and by refusing to give her sole custody of the parties' son. Both parties take issue with the manner in which the trial court divided their property. The wife asserts that the trial court erred by classifying the husband's interest in the real property on which his family's restaurant is located as separate property and by failing to award her a portion of the appreciation in the value of his family restaurant business. The husband takes issue with the trial court's refusal to award him certain items of household furnishings. Finally, the wife asserts that she is entitled to post-judgment interest on the judgment used to equalize the distribution of the marital estate, as well as her legal expenses incurred on appeal. We have determined that the trial court's fault determination, joint custody arrangement, and division of marital property are supported by the record. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and deny the wife's request for appellate legal expenses.

Margaret Parker vs. Kroger Co.
02A01-9812-CV-00373
Trial Court Judge: James F. Russell

Memphis Credit Union vs. Mary Montgomery
02A01-9810-CV-00286
Trial Court Judge: Karen R. Williams

Randall Henley, et al vs. Russell Amacher, et al
M1999-02799-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Buddy D. Perry
This appeal involves an early morning, drunken joyride by four teenagers that ended when their sport utility vehicle overturned. One of the passengers who was injured when he was thrown from the vehicle sued the driver and his father in the Circuit Court for Franklin County seeking $200,000. A jury assessed the passenger's damages and attributed 75% of the fault to the driver and 25% of the fault to the passenger. In accordance with the jury's verdict, the trial court awarded the passenger a $34,125 judgment against the driver and his father. On this appeal, the driver and his father take issue with (1) the allocation of less than 50% of the fault to the passenger, (2) the lack of evidence to support the application of the family purpose doctrine, (3) the awards for permanent impairment and future medical expenses, and (4) the trial court's refusal to give two requested instructions. We have determined that the only reversible error in the proceeding involves the jury's decision to award the passenger $20,000 for future medical expenses. Accordingly, we affirm the jury's verdict as to liability and allocation of fault. With regard to the damage award, we suggest a remittitur which, if accepted, will reduce the passenger's judgment to $19,125.

02A01-9802-CH-00269
02A01-9802-CH-00269
Trial Court Judge: George R. Ellis

Becky Chenault vs. William Carsley
02A01-9710-CV-00255
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree

In the matter of S.MC. and J.L.C.
01A01-9807-JV-00358
Trial Court Judge: Andrew J. Shookhoff

Katherine Theresa DeVault, v. James Canon DeVault, Jr.
01-A-01-9806-CV-00270
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Judge Muriel Robinson

This appeal involves a dispute over child support for the parties' two minor children. The trial court denied the Father's petition to modify the support as it had been set in the final decree. In addition, the court placed a lien on two of the Father's properties and awarded fees to the Mother's attorney. On appeal, we affirm the court's decision with regard to child support and attorney fes. However, regarding the lien, we modify the trial court's decision such that a lien remains on only one of the Father's proerties. Accordingly, the decision of the trial court is affirmed as modified and remand for further proceedings.

Almetter Chalmers vs. Exchange Ins.
02A01-9711-CV-00280
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown

Stanley Wilson v. Jim Davenport, Tennessee Department of Employment Security and Carrier Air Conditioning
02A01-9712-CH-00301
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Floyd Peete, Jr.

This is an unemployment benefits case. The claimant’s employment was terminated, based on alleged misconduct. His application for employment benefits was denied. After administrative appeals, the chancery court affirmed the denial of benefits. The claimant appeals. We affirm the decision of the chancery court based on the claimant’s failure to timely file his petition for a writ of certiorari.

Janice Young vs. John Doe, et al., - Concurring
01A01-9810-CV-00517
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Judge Thomas W. Graham

This is an uninsured motorist insurance case. Plaintiff/Appellant, Janice C. Young, appeals the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to the unnamed Defendant/Appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm).

Regina Harris, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of a Minor, v. Dr. Andrew L. Chern and Baptist Hospital, Inc.
01A01-9806-CV-00299
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Thomas W. Brothers

This is a medical malpractice case where in Ronnie Dale Netherton, Jr., sustained severe brain injury incident to his birth at Baptist Hospital, Inc. The Trial Judge granted a partial judgment in favor of Baptist as to any negligence alleged against it in connectin with the post-natal care of Plaintiff Ronnie Netherton, Jr. Although the Trial Judge overruled themotion for summary judgment alleging negligence by Baptist preceding Ronnie's birth, the Trial Judge, when ruling on the Plaintiff's motino to reconsider his orfer of partial summary judgment, overruled the motion and made the partial summary judgment final pursuant to Rule 54 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, resulting in this appeal.

Ideal Products, Inc., v. Agmark Foods, Inc.
01A01-9807-CV-00348
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Gilcrease, Jr.

This suit involves a commercial lease agreement entered into by Agmark Foods, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, with Ideal Products, Inc. Plaintiff-Appellee, for container chassis used in transporting commodities and bulk products. Agmark Contends that the Chancellor improperly granted a summary judgment in favor of Ideal.

First Deposit National Bank, v. Men K. Quach
01A01-9809-CH-00505
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Carol L. McCoy

This is an attack on the service of a summons. The Chancery Court of Davidson County refused to set aside a default judgment based on the sheriff’s return. We affirm.

Homer R. (Toby) Barnes, et al. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. - Concurring
03A01-9812-CH-00403
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Telford E. Fogety, Jr.

In this Declaratory Judgment action, the Trial Judge entered summary judgment against Employers Mutual Casualty Company, in favor of the plaintiffs, declaring “[t]he defendant owes the plaintiffs a duty of defense of the action pending in the Circuit Court for Sevier County, Tennessee, captioned Devin Phillips v. Toby Barnes . . . and further owes indemnity coverage respecting such claim , pursuant to the policies of insurance in question . . .”. The judgment was entered pursuant to T.R.C.P. Rule 54.02, and the insurance company has appealed that decision to this Court.

Paul Farnsworth v. Billy Compton, et al.
02A01-9809-CV-00257
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Judge R. Lee Moore Jr.

Paul Farnsworth, a pro se inmate, has appealed the trial court’s dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action that was brought against numerous individually named defendants. Based upon the following, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal.
 

Elease Owens, for herself and as next-of-kin to Etherline Bailey, Deceased v. Methodist Healthcare Systems and William C. Phelps, M.D.
02A01-9704-CV-00089
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Janice M. Holder

This is a medical malpractice case. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant physician caused
the death of the decedent in the course of childbirth. The jury found in favor of the defendant physician. The plaintiff appeals, asserting error in the jury instructions and juror misconduct. We
affirm.

Donald Sweeney and Vickie Sweeney Moulton, et al., v. Eric Erwin
01A01-9807-CH-00387
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Allen W. Wallace

This is an appeal from a chancery decree awardingspecific performance to the purchasers of a tract of real estate and denying a counterclaim for rent. The lower court rendered the decree after a full evidentiary hearing on the merits. The appellant has not furnished this court with a transcript of the evidence heard at the trial.

Mary Jean Brewer, v. Edward Lelon Brewer, Jr.
01A01-9710-CH-00611
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert E. Corlew, III

This case tests the power of the trial court to order an adult, slightly handicapped child to visit his father. The Chancery Court of Rutherford County held that it was the duty of the court to require the visitation. We hold that under the circumstances of this case the court exceeded its jurisdiction.

Peggy Ann Bouchillon Brasfield v. Jimmy Carroll Brasfield - Concurring
03A01-9804-CH-00144
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Jerry Beck

This is an appeal from a reduction in ordered child support.

Janet G. Seals v. Jefferson City, Tennessee and Jefferson County, Tennessee
03A01-9808-CV-00269
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Rex Henry Ogle

The issue presented by this appeal is whether an amendment to T.C. A.50 -1-304, (commonly knownn as the Whistle Blower Statute), which brough employees of the State of Tennessee within its purview, should be given retrospective effect.

Bill Jennings v. Lawler-Wood, Inc.
03A01-9803-CV-00111
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Richard E. Ladd

The controversy giving rise to this appeal had its genesis in a service contract for washers and dryers entered into between Plaintiff Bill Jennings and Defendant Lawler-Wood, Inc., which manageg Maple Oak apartments for the owners. 

City of Lafayette v. Mark and Ruby Hammock
01A01-9901-CV-00056
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bobby H. Capers

In its eminent domain proceeding, the City of Lafayette (City) took a small strip of Mark and Ruby Hammock’s land along the City’s right-of-way for an existing street.

Stone Fort Land Company v. The Tennessee Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board, et al. - Concurring
01A01-9707-CH-00370
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle

This case involves eligibility for environmental cleanup funds. The plaintiff landowner appeals the decision of the Tennessee Petroleum Underground Tank Board finding the plaintiff ineligible to receive reimbursement from the petroleum underground storage tank fund established in Tennessee Code Annotated § 68-215-110. Upon initial review in chancery court, the Board’s decision was reversed. The trial court subsequently reconsidered its decision and, based on recent Tennessee appellate decisions, affirmed the Board’s decision to deny assistance. We affirm.

Pearl Nixon, v. Shoney's, Inc.
01A01-9711-CV-00629
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bobby H. Capers

This is a personal injury slip and fall case. The plaintiff was injured when she fell in the defendant’s restaurant due to a tray negligently left on the floor. The defendant restaurant admits liability but asserts that the evidence does not support the amount of the trial court’s award and seeks a remittitur. We affirm the trial court’s decision as modified.