COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

01A01-9508-CH-00344
01A01-9508-CH-00344
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9508-CH-00344
01A01-9508-CH-00344
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Victoria Ins. vs. Annie Hawkins, et al
W1999-01650-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Childers

Shelby Court of Appeals

02A01-9501-CV-00010
02A01-9501-CV-00010

Shelby Court of Appeals

02A01-9502-CH-00016
02A01-9502-CH-00016
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small

Shelby Court of Appeals

02A01-9503-CV-00049
02A01-9503-CV-00049
Trial Court Judge: Kay S. Robilio

Shelby Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Anderson Court of Appeals

01A01-9509-PB-00415
01A01-9509-PB-00415
Trial Court Judge: Daniel Phillip Whitaker

Marshall Court of Appeals

Judgment And Must, Therefore, Affirm. Reagor v. Dyer County, 651 S.W.2D 700, 701 (Tenn.
01A01-9511-CV-00497

Davidson Court of Appeals

Dept of Children's Srvcs. v. Barbara Davidson
M2003-02601-COA-R3-PT
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Samuel E. Benningfield
The Juvenile Court of White County terminated the parental rights of the natural parents of two young girls. The Father suffered judgment by default and did not appeal. Parental rights of the Mother were terminated after trial on the merits and she appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

White Court of Appeals

01A01-9508-CV-00384
01A01-9508-CV-00384
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Brothers

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9510-CH-00469
01A01-9510-CH-00469
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt

Davidson Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

01A01-9504-PB-00181
01A01-9504-PB-00181
Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9412-JV-00600
01A01-9412-JV-00600
Trial Court Judge: Andrew J. Shookhoff

Davidson Court of Appeals

03A01-9508-CV-00290
03A01-9508-CV-00290
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young

Blount Court of Appeals

Tammy Rushing Greene v. Bryan Lynn Greene
03A01-9503-CV-00091
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Judge James C. Witt

This is a child custody case. Bryan L. Greene (Father) and Tammy Rushing Greene, now Harris (Mother), were divorced by decree entered June 2, 1988. The decree incorporated a prior Marital Dissolution Agreement, which granted custody of the parties' minor child, Sara Ann 1This Court granted Mother’s Motion for Stay Pending Appeal, pursuant to T.R.A.P. 7. 2 Greene, to Mother, with liberal visitation rights to Father. On September 15, 1994, Father filed a petition seeking custody, alleging a material change in circumstances. After an evidentiary hearing on March 10, 1995, the trial court granted Father's Petition for Change of Custody. 1 Mother has appealed, and the only issue is whether the trial court erred in ordering a change of custody.

Monroe Court of Appeals

Susiana Dixon, best next friend and Niece of Martha J. Moses, v. Johnnie Street, Defendant, Robert C. Irby, Guardian ad Litem-Appellee
02A01-9504-CH-00069
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor D. J. Alissandratos

This case involves an award of guardian ad litem fees. Appellant, Martha J. Moses, conservator of the person of Susiana Dixon, appeals the trial court’s order made final pursuant to Rule 54.02 awarding a money judgment against her in the sum of $3,127.00 in favor of 2 appellee Robert C. Irby, guardian at litem for Susiana Dixon.

Shelby Court of Appeals

Charles K. Lockwood and Frankie L. Lockwood, v. William M. Ables
01A01-9509-CV-00422
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Judge William H. Inman

In this legal malpractice case, the trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant because he found that the plaintiffs failed to prove that but for the defendant’s negligence they would have won their lawsuit. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Marion Court of Appeals

Betty Manis, v. Jerry K. Galyon
03A01-9512-CH-00433
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Chester H. Rainwater

This action was instituted as a complaint for a declaratory judgment and for a partition of real estate. The appellant sought a declaratory judgment that she was the owner of an undivided interest in a tract of land located in Sevier County as a tenant in common with the appellee. She further sought to have the court partition the property in question. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court sustained the defendant's motion for summary judgment, denied plaintiff's motion and fond that the appellant held no interest in the property. This appeal resulted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Court of Appeals

Atlanta Casualty Company, v. Margie Etta Fuson, Damon Lee Fuson and Shannon Nicole Fuson
03A01-9507-CV-00232
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Conrad E. Troutman, Jr.

This appeal stems from a declaratory judgment action filed by Appellant, Atlanta Casualty Company (Atlanta Casualty), seeking a determination of whether an automobile insurance policy issued by Atlanta Casualty to Damon P. Fuson, now deceased, affords uninsured motorist coverage to the appellees, Margie Etta Fuson, surviving spouse of the deceased, and their two minor children, Damon Lee and Shannon Nicole Fuson (hereinafter “the Fusons”). The trial court entertained motions for summary judgment filed by both parties. The trial court denied Appellant’s motion, but entered summary judgment in favor of the appellees, finding that the insurance policy in question affords them coverage. For reasons hereinafter detailed, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Claiborne Court of Appeals

Carol Louise Kepler, v. Scott James Kepler
03A01-9508-CV-00248
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bill Swann

This divorce litigation involves the dissolution of the twenty-one year marriage between Appellant, Scott James Kepler (Husband) and Appellee, Carol Louise Kepler (Wife). Their union produced two children, ages 17 and 14 at the time of trial. The final divorce decree granted an absolute divorce and custody of the children to Wife. Husband now appeals from the decree, challenging the trial court’s valuation of the marital residence, award of rehabilitative alimony and attorney’s fees to Wife and failure to establish an “ascertainable standard” by which to measure Wife’s progress towards completion of her educational goals. For reasons to be discussed, we affirm the trial court.

Knox Court of Appeals

John Phipps and Sandra Phipps, v. Robert Wayne Walker and Randall Wayne Walker
03A01-9508-CV-00294
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Judge W. Dale Young

This action for negligent hiring results from the alleged burglary of the home of Appellants, John and Sandra Phipps, by Randall Wayne Walker, son and employee of the appellee, Robert Wayne Walker.1 Appellee is the owner of Walker Electric which, in 1994, sub-contracted with Shore Builders, Inc. to perform the electrical work on the Appellants’ home, then under construction. Randall Walker was an employee of Walker Electric at this time.

Blount Court of Appeals

Allstate Insurance Company, v. Mary Louis Davis, John Rasnic, Carolyn Rasnic, and Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Companies
03A01-9512-C-00426
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel Pickens Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Conrad Troutman

In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff, insurance company, sought a declaration that its insured, John H. Rasnic, was not an insured under its policy for the accident occuring between the Rasnic and Davis motor vehicles. Specifically, the complaint alleged that Rasnic had violated the policy provision:

We must be notified promptly of how, when, and where the accident or loss happened. Notice should also include the names and addresses of any injuried persons and of any witness. Allstate would assert that while the accident occurred on December 1, 1993, they did not receive notice until June 24, 1994.

Court of Appeals

Sandra K. Lewis, and husband, Carlton Lewis, v. Jason M. Pendergrass and R. Eugene Pendergrass
03A01- 9510- CV- 00369
Trial Court Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks

The determinative issue on appeal as framed by the appellant is: [Whether] the defendants were deprived of a fair and impartial jury because of Juror Rankin's failure to respond truthfully on voir dire and further, because Juror Rankin and plaintiffs' counsel both failed to reveal a recent attorney/client relationship and an upcoming trial wherein plaintiffs' counsel would be a crucial witness on behalf of Juror Rankin.

Court of Appeals