Frank McNeil, MD. and Janet McNeil, M.D. v. TN. Board of Medical Examiners - Concurring
The captioned petitioners sought judicial review and reversal of the administrative order of the respondent Board subjecting them to discipline for professional misconduct. From a judgment affirming the administrative order, the petitioners have appealed, presenting the issue for review in the following terms: The Petitioner-Appellants, Frank McNiel, M.D. and Janet McNiel, M.D., respectfully submit that the issue presented for review in this case is whether or not the Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners’ decision to discipline their license to practice medicine in Tennessee should be reversed pursuant to T.C.A. §4-5-322(h) of the Tennessee Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, in that the decision was not supported by substantial and material evidence and was otherwise arbitrary and capricious. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Anthony Lee Eden, v. CherylAnn Eden
The Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided by memorandum opinion, it shall be designated "MEMORANDUM OPINION," shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in a subsequent unrelated case. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ila Stephens Bertram v. Charles R. Gernt, Estate of Bruno Gernt, Inc. Champion International Corporation, Hood Coal Company, et. al .
The plaintiff filed suit to establish present title to land in Fentress County that had previously belonged to her family. The Chancery Court dismissed her suit on the ground that she lost whatever interest she had in the land through foreclosure. After examining the record and the briefs of the parties, we find that the trial court did not err in dismissing the suit, and we affirm. |
Fentress | Court of Appeals | |
Randall Myers v. Hurst Construction Company, Inc.
The Trial Court and this Court have granted permission to the Hurst Construction Co., Inc., to appeal from an interlocutory order of the Trial Court overruling the motion of Hurst Construction Co., Inc., for summary judgment on grounds of the statute of limitations. |
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Tennessee Consumer Advocate, v. Tennessee Regulatory Authority and United Cities Gas Company
The petitioner, Tennessee Consumer Advocate, has petitioned this Court for review of administrative decisions of the Tennessee Public Services Commission pursuant to T.R.A.P. Rule 12. By order entered by this Court on October 3, 1996, the review is limited to an order entered by the Commission on May 3, 1996. However, the circumstances stated hereafter require reference to an order previously entered by the Tennessee Public Service Commission on May 12, 1995. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Klindt vs. Klindt
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
The Tennessean vs. Electric Power Bd. of Nashville
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State, DHS Assignee of: Stanley vs. Hooper
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
J. Harold Shankle Co. vs. Bedford Co. Bd.
|
Bedford | Court of Appeals | |
Davis vs. Rose
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Thomas, et. ux. vs. Crockett, et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Thomas, et. ux. vs. Crockett, et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Smith vs. Duncan
|
Fentress | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
State Farm & Casualty vs. Pickral, et. ux.
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Fisher & Bell vs. Metro Gov't.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Davis vs. Burson
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Houser vs. Traughber
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9604-CH-00362
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Jones vs. Jones
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Brooks vs. Brooks
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Overton | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9608-CH-00247
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9607-JV-00234
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals |