COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS

Daryl Turner vs. State of Tennessee
01C01-9608-CR-00374
Authoring Judge: Judge William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jane Wheatcraft

The appellant, Daryl Turner, appeals the Sumner County Criminal Court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. In 1993, appellant was convicted of selling a Schedule II controlled substance, to wit: cocaine, and was sentenced to twelve (12) years as a Range III persistent offender. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by this Court on direct appeal. See State v. Darrel Tucker1, No. 01-C-01-9310-CR00347 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, Oct. 6, 1994), per. app. denied (Tenn. 1995). The appellant, thereafter, filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, malicious prosecution, and invalid “reasonable doubt” jury instructions.2 Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court dismissed appellant’s petition upon finding no ground to warrant post-conviction relief. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.

Daryl Turner vs. State of Tennessee
01C01-9608-CR-00374
Authoring Judge: Judge William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jane Wheatcraft

The appellant, Daryl Turner, appeals the Sumner County Criminal Court’s dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. In 1993, appellant was convicted of selling a Schedule II controlled substance, to wit: cocaine, and was sentenced to twelve (12) years as a Range III persistent offender. His conviction and sentence were affirmed by this Court on direct appeal. See State v. Darrel Tucker1, No. 01-C-01-9310-CR00347 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, Oct. 6, 1994), per. app. denied (Tenn. 1995). The appellant, thereafter, filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, malicious prosecution, and invalid “reasonable doubt” jury instructions.2 Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court dismissed appellant’s petition upon finding no ground to warrant post-conviction relief. We affirm the  judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.

Randy Hicks v. State of Tennessee
03C01-9608-CR-00296
Authoring Judge: Judge Curwood Witt
Trial Court Judge: Judge Mayo L. Mashburn

Randy Hicks appeals the McMinn County Criminal Court's summary dismissal of his "Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence Rule 22, FRCrP." The lower court considered this "motion" under the law applicable to motions for new trial, petitions for writ of error coram nobis, and petitions for post-conviction relief, found it without merit, and summarily dismissed Hicks's claim without conducting a hearing. Hicks's underlying conviction is for criminal facilitation of first degree murder, for which he is serving a 25 year sentence. State v. Hicks, 835 S.W.2d 32 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992). In his pro se appellate brief, Hicks never directly attacks the lower court's denial of his "motion," but he does raise several issues relating to the admission of evidence, denial of a severance and the sufficiency of the convicting evidence at his trial. He also filed with his pro se appellate brief a document entitled Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis, in which he alleges that the district attorney knowingly and willfully submitted false evidence in his trial.1 Having painstakingly reviewed the record and Hicks's brief, we affirm the trial court's summary dismissal of the claim. Likewise, we find the petition filed in this court proper for dismissal.

State vs. Manning
03C01-9501-CR-00012
Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb

State vs. Trampas Sweeney
01C01-9702-CC-00053
Trial Court Judge: William M. Barker

State vs. Garrison
03C01-9702-CC-00047
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Graham

State vs. Dewayne Cathey
02C01-9612-CR-00446
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

State vs. Gabriel Blackman
02C01-9704-CC-00135
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

01C01-9512-CR-00414
01C01-9512-CR-00414

01C01-9602-CC-00052
01C01-9602-CC-00052

01C01-9608-CR-00347
01C01-9608-CR-00347
Trial Court Judge: Ann Lacy Johns

State vs. Alfonzo Chalmers
W2000-00440-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft
The defendant appeals from his conviction for first degree premeditated murder. He contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that the trial court erred by impermissibly commenting on the evidence in violation of article VI, section 9 of the Constitution of Tennessee. We affirm the judgment of conviction.

State vs. Crain
03C01-9604-CC-00149

State vs. Millsaps
03C01-9601-CC-00044

03C01-9608-CR-00309
03C01-9608-CR-00309
Trial Court Judge: Frank L. Slaughter

State vs. Jones
03C01-9701-CR-00016
Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer

State vs. Donald Long
02C01-9610-CC-00362
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

State vs. Jeffery Casey
02C01-9701-CC-00015
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

State vs. Robert Bitner
02C01-9705-CC-00177
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

State vs. Leon Woodlee
01C01-9611-CC-00465

State vs. Willliam Trotter .
01C01-9701-CR-00019
Trial Court Judge: Ann Lacy Johns

State vs. Willliam Trotter .
01C01-9701-CR-00019

State vs. Chloe Clark
01C01-9704-CC-00134
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton

Chad Swatzell vs. State
01C01-9604-CC-00154

State vs. McConnell
03C01-9604-CC-00148