Home Builders Association of Middle Tennessee, et al. v. Williamson County, et al. - Dissenting

Case Number
M2008-00835-SC-R11-CV

I respectfully dissent. Although I agree with the majority’s sound conclusion that Williamson County was required to collect the new development tax at the time of the application for the building permit, I disagree with the ruling that ultimate tax liability must be based on the projected – rather than the actual – square footage of construction. I would, therefore, hold that when the developer has paid a sum based on projected square footage and later built a larger structure than initially anticipated, the County would be entitled to recover the deficiency in payment. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 5-6-108(6) (2005), 9-3-202 (1999).

Authoring Judge
Justice Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge
Chancellor Jeffrey S. Bivins
Case Name
Home Builders Association of Middle Tennessee, et al. v. Williamson County, et al. - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion