State vs. Michael Stevenson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Stevenson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kynan Redmond
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Thomas Johnson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9904-CC-00144
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9901-CR-00032
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Andre Lee
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
McConnell vs. State
|
Supreme Court | ||
Jabari Mandela v. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Walker
|
Maury | Supreme Court | |
William Wyatt v. Board of Paroles
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Moss vs. Vanderbilt Univ. Med. Ctr.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Norton vs. McCaskill
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Aimee Lynn Wolfe
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
The Realty Assoc., et al, vs. Richter/Dial Builders, Inc., et al
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Lyons vs. Farmers Insurance, et al
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Williams vs. Berube & Assoc., et al
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
Parkey vs. Parkey
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Kanbi vs. Sousa
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Bomar vs. TN Dept. of Mental Health
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ground For a Petition To Rehear. See Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587, 618,
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Christopher Scott Wells, v. Betty Sue Wells
Christopher Scott Wells (“Father”) and Betty Sue Wells (“Mother”) divorced in October 1997. By the terms of their Marital Dissolution Agreement (MDA), the parties had joint custody of the two children with Mother as primary custodian. Shortly after the MDA was accepted by the court, Father changed his mind. He sought custody of the children based on Mother’s relationships with men. The trial court found no change in circumstances and left custody with Mother. Because of evidence of the children’s altered behavior during their visit with Father, we find it necessary to remand the case to the trial court for a determination of the best interests of the children, including the comparative fitness of the parents at the time of the hearing on remand. |
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Charlotte Brown, v. Birman Managed Care, David N. Birman, Sue d. Birman, William F. Barenkamp, II, and Kathy Barenkamp
The divorced mother of a minor child claimed that her former husband and his employer conspired to fraudulently understate the husband’s income, in order to defeat her attempts to have his child support obligation increased to an appropriate amount. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. We reverse. |
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Janie Cousett
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Brandon Bills
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals |