Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

COURT

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

State vs. Williams 03C01-9701-CR-00002 Trial Court Judge: Mary Beth Leibowitz	Knox	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
Johnson vs. State 03C01-9707-CR-00241 Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer	Hamilton	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
Hicks vs. State 03C01-9707-CR-00242 Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Ervin 03C01-9707-CC-00311	Blount	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Graham 03C01-9707-CC-00314 Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.	Anderson	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
03C01-9706-CR-00231 03C01-9706-CR-00231 Trial Court Judge: Arden L. Hill	Carter	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Woods 03C01-9707-CC-00272	Blount	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Killian 03C01-9711-CC-00513 Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.	Blount	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Juan Alfonzo Hill 03C01-9710-CR-00441 Trial Court Judge: Arden L. Hill	Washington	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. J. Brown 03C01-9710-CR-00484 Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb	McMinn	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
Mosley vs. State 03C01-9710-CR-00473 Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Lowery 03C01-9710-CR-00475 Trial Court Judge: Ray L. Jenkins	Knox	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
03C01-9502-CR-00038 03C01-9502-CR-00038 Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.	Blount	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
03C01-9502-CR-00035 03C01-9502-CR-00035	Cocke	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
John Penley vs. State E2000-00154-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles Trial Court Judge: Phyllis H. Miller The Defendant filed for post-conviction relief, alleging that his guilty plea to drug-related charges (1) was not knowingly and voluntarily entered; (2) was the result of ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) was contaminated by illegal evidence. After a hearing, the trial court denied relief, and the Defendant appeals as of right. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Eunyce Saunders E1998-00230-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall Trial Court Judge: Phyllis H. Miller	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Joe N. Anderson E1998-00378-CCA-R3-CD		Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Eunyce Saunders E1998-00230-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall Trial Court Judge: Phyllis H. Miller	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Wade Henry Allen Marsh E1998-00057-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil	Hamilton	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Christopher Lindsay E1998-00036-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.	Anderson	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Kenneth Griffin E1998-00037-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade Trial Court Judge: Arden L. Hill	Washington	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Larry Keith Huddle E1999-00250-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton Trial Court Judge: Phyllis H. Miller	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. Charles Edward Overby E1999-00253-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade Trial Court Judge: Carroll L. Ross	Bradley	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
Jerry L. Johns vs. State E1999-00260-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen	Morgan	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10
State vs. James David Lamor Perry E1999-00271-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall Trial Court Judge: Phyllis H. Miller Defendant James David Lamor Perry was convicted of two counts of possession of cocaine, more than .5 grams, within 1000 feet of a school, and one count of possession of marijuana. Defendant was fined and sentenced to 20 years on each cocaine possession count and to 6 months on the marijuana count, all sentences to run concurrently. On this direct appeal Defendant now raises numerous challenges to his convictions, including issues regarding the constitutionality and interpretation of the Drug-Free School Zone Act. Defendant also argues that his sentence for the cocaine possession counts is excessive. We find no error and affirm Defendant's convictions and sentences.	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	12/01/10