A building contractor agreed to make certain repairs to a residence and procured a performance bond as required by the Metro Government. To obtain the bond the contractor was required to execute an indemnity agreement favorably to the bonding company. The homeowner complained of the quality of the contractor's workmanship, and the Codes Department of the Metro. Government determined that certain remedial action should be taken by the contractor in order to achieve compliance with the building code. The contractor declined to do so, insisting that the problems complained of were caused by the homeowner; whereupon, the bonding company engaged another contractor to make the repairs, and filed this action against the initial contractor for indemnification. The Circuit Court ruled in favor of the bonding company. We affirm.
Case Number
M2002-01890-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Judge Walter C. Kurtz
Case Name
Old Republic Surety v. Morris Eshaghpour
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
Oldrepublic.pdf25.1 KB