Case Number
M2002-02082-COA-R3-CV
The plaintiff filed suit for repayment of $25,000 which he purportedly loaned to the defendant. The defendant contended that the money was not a loan, but was placed with him for a specific investment. Since the investment ultimately failed, the defendant claimed that he did not owe anything to the plaintiff. The trial court noted that the documents evidencing the transactions at issue were “replete with ambiguities,” but found that they were nonetheless sufficient to establish an enforceable loan contract. The court accordingly rendered a plaintiff’s judgment for $25,000 plus interest. We reverse.
Originating Judge
Judge Ross H. Hicks
Case Name
James W. Stephenson v. The Third Company, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
StephJW.pdf84.75 KB