Martha M. Boote v. Helen Boote Shivers, et al.

Case Number
M2003-00560-COA-R3-CV

This appeal involves a challenge to an antenuptial agreement. Following the death of her husband, the decedent's wife filed a petition in the Chancery Court for Marshall County to have her husband's will and two codicils admitted to probate in solemn form. She later discovered that a third codicil that would have dramatically increased her share of the estate had not been properly revoked. When the trial court rebuffed her efforts to have the third codicil admitted to probate, she filed a petition to dissent from the will and to seek an elective share of the estate and one year's support. The decedent's daughters opposed the petitions based on an antenuptial agreement the wife had entered into with the decedent, and the wife challenged the enforceability of the antenuptial agreement. Following a bench trial, the court set aside the antenuptial agreement after finding that the decedent's wife did not enter into the agreement knowledgeably and without duress. The decedent's daughters appealed. We have determined that the antenuptial agreement is enforceable.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge
Chancellor J. B. Cox
Case Name
Martha M. Boote v. Helen Boote Shivers, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version