Robert Crawford, Sr. et al. v. J. Avery Bryan Funeral Home, Inc.et al. - Concurring/Dissenting

Case Number
E2006-00987-COA-R3-CV

The defendants’ filings in this case clearly establish that Teri Crawford does not have a cause of action for intentional interference with the dead body of her brother, Robert H. Crawford. That cause of action belonged to Mr. Crawford’s widow, to the exclusion of all others. Furthermore, in my opinion, the record before us negates Ms. Crawford’s alleged causes of action against all defendants except those asserted against the individuals and entities directly associated with the operation of the Tri-State Crematory (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “the Tri-State Defendants”). As to these latter individuals and entities, I believe the defendants’ filings fail to negate Ms. Crawford’s three causes of action for (1) intentional, (2) reckless, and (3) negligent infliction of mental distress. Therefore, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court was correct in dismissing Ms. Crawford’s complaint with respect to these “infliction of mental distress” theories.

Authoring Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge W. Neil Thomas, III
Case Name
Robert Crawford, Sr. et al. v. J. Avery Bryan Funeral Home, Inc.et al. - Concurring/Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version