Case Number
W2011-02501-COA-R3-CV
I concur in the majority’s holding that the followup drug screen at issue was not a “[r]ecord[] of the identity, diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment” of Mr. Payton, and therefore was not covered by 42 U.S.C.A. § 290dd-2(a).
Originating Judge
Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Case Name
City of Memphis Civil Service Commission v. Steven Payton - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
paytonscon.pdf56.65 KB