Edward Joseph Warwick, Sr. v. Katherine Dodge Gribben Warwick, et al.

Case Number
E2011-01969-COA-R3-CV

Edward Joseph Warwick, Sr. (“Husband”) sued his former spouse, Katherine Dodge Gribben Warwick (“Wife”); her attorney, David W. Noblit (“Counsel”); and Noblit’s law firm (collectively “Defendants”). Husband alleges that, since the time of the parties’ divorce, Wife and Counsel had conspired against him in an effort to destroy him and gain access to his separate funds. Husband claims the Defendants are guilty of fraud on the court, abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a civil conspiracy, for which he seeks eight million dollars in compensatory and punitive damages. Defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings. Following a hearing, the trial court dismissed Husband’s complaint. The court stated “that the[] causes of action are barred by the statute of limitations or that the complaint failed to state a claim, or both.” Husband appeals. We affirm.

Authoring Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge Buddy D. Perry
Case Name
Edward Joseph Warwick, Sr. v. Katherine Dodge Gribben Warwick, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
warwickej.pdf180.05 KB