Darrell Trigg v. Little Six Corporation et al.

Case Number
E2013-01929-COA-R9-CV

The issue in this wrongful termination action is the enforceability of an arbitration clause in an agreement between the plaintiff employee and his former employer. Plaintiff executed an employment agreement in 2007. Employer terminated plaintiff without cause in April 2012. He brought this action alleging common law retaliatory discharge and violations of the Tennessee Public Protection Act and the Tennessee Human Rights Act. Employer filed a motion to compel arbitration. Plaintiff argued that the arbitration clause is unenforceable because it is unconscionable due to the “excessive” and “prohibitive” costs of arbitration. The trial court found that the agreement had been freely negotiated and was neither a contract of adhesion nor unconscionable. We affirm the judgment of the trial court enforcing the agreement and ordering arbitration.

Authoring Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge Thomas J. Wright
Case Name
Darrell Trigg v. Little Six Corporation et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
triggdopn.pdf147.18 KB