Case Number
E2019-00538-COA-T10B-CV
This accelerated interlocutory appeal follows the denial of a motion to recuse. The party seeking recusal claimed that an in-limine motion was granted after an ex parte communication between the chancellor and the counsel moving in limine. Additionally, the party claimed that the court showed partiality by not granting a continuance of the hearing on the in-limine motion when her counsel was unable to attend due to illness. We affirm the denial of the recusal request.
Originating Judge
Judge Clarence E. Pridemore, Jr.
Case Name
Laurie Elizabeth Lee v. Bryan Mitchell Lee
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
lee_v._lee_opinion.pdf122.81 KB