Volodymyr Helyukh, Et Al. v. Buddy Head Livestock & Trucking, Inc.

Case Number
M2019-02301-COA-R9-CV

The dispositive issue in this personal injury action is whether the claims against the defendant trucking company for the tortious acts of its employee/truck driver are time-barred under Abshure v. Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals, 325 S.W.3d 98 (Tenn. 2010) or saved by the commencement of a new action under Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-105, Tennessee’s “savings statute.” After the plaintiffs commenced the new action, the company filed a motion to summarily dismiss the complaint, asserting the plaintiffs’ claims against the employee were procedurally barred before the new action was commenced. The trial court denied the motion because the first action was instituted before the plaintiffs’ right of action against the employee became extinguished by operation of law, and the second complaint was timely filed pursuant to the savings statute. For the same reason, we affirm and remand for further proceedings.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge Frank G. Clement, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge John D. Wootten, Jr.
Case Name
Volodymyr Helyukh, Et Al. v. Buddy Head Livestock & Trucking, Inc.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version