COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

E1998-00745-COA-R3-CV E1998-00745-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.	Claiborne	Court of Appeals	01/28/00
Advantage Funding Corp. vs. Mid-TN Manufacturing Co. M1997-00133-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr. Trial Court Judge: James E. Walton	Montgomery	Court of Appeals	01/27/00
Lineberry vs. Ashe M1999-00075-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray	Wilson	Court of Appeals	01/27/00
Baker, et al vs. American Paper and Twine Co. M1999-00142-COA-R9-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Soloman	Davidson	Court of Appeals	01/27/00
Woodridge Properties vs. Franco-Ward M1999-00458-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.	Montgomery	Court of Appeals	01/27/00
West vs. West M1998-00725-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Warren	Court of Appeals	01/27/00
E1999-02263-COA-R3-CV E1999-02263-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard	Hamblen	Court of Appeals	01/27/00
In This Action F Or Damag Es For Injuries Sustained In a Motor Ve Hicle E1999-02271-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks		Court of Appeals	01/27/00
The Nam Es of The Hu Sband An D Wife. Th E Parties Also a Cquired Va Rious Hous Ehold E1999-01326-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks		Court of Appeals	01/27/00
E1999-00014-COA-R3-CV E1999-00014-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks		Court of Appeals	01/27/00
E1998-00349-COA-R3-CV E1998-00349-COA-R3-CV		Court of Appeals	01/27/00
E1999-00380-COA-R3- E1999-00380-COA-R3-		Court of Appeals	01/27/00
Tommy Lee White vs. Caroldene White E1998-00664-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks		Court of Appeals	01/27/00
02296-COA-R3-CV 02296-COA-R3-CV	Sevier	Court of Appeals	01/26/00
03A01-9902-CV-00056 03A01-9902-CV-00056		Court of Appeals	01/26/00
03A01-9903-GS-00083 03A01-9903-GS-00083	Blount	Court of Appeals	01/26/00
Public Employees vs. Alana Parminter W2000-01540-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos Administrator of employee's deferred income plan filed a complaint for a declaratory judgment seeking a determination of the proper beneficiary, either employee's widow or employee's sister entitled to the funds after the employee's death. The dispute basically involves an interpretation of the plan terms dealing with the method of changing beneficiaries. The trial court awarded the funds to employee's widow; an employee's sister has appealed. We vacate and remand.	Shelby	Court of Appeals	01/26/00
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX		Court of Appeals	01/26/00
E1999-02285-COA-R3-CV E1999-02285-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	01/26/00
E1999-01308-COA-R3-CV E1999-01308-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard	Scott	Court of Appeals	01/26/00
James R. Golden vs. Holly N. Hood (Black) E1999-02443-COA-MR3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks		Court of Appeals	01/26/00
E1999-02427-COA-R3-CV E1999-02427-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.	Anderson	Court of Appeals	01/26/00
E1999-02474-COA-R3-CV E1999-02474-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney	Sullivan	Court of Appeals	01/26/00
03A01-9808-CV-00282 03A01-9808-CV-00282	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	01/25/00
Sandra Silverstein vs. William Rice W1999-01336-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby Trial Court Judge: George R. Ellis This is a suit to enforce a past child support obligation. The mother filed suit against the father, seeking past due child support payments, health insurance premiums and medical costs for the parties' three minor children. The trial court held for the mother, and granted her a judgment for the child support arrearages, health insurance and medical costs, attorney's fees and pre-judgment interest on the child support arrearages. The father appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the trial court erred by failing to prorate his child support obligation as each child attained majority. We affirm, holding that the trial court was not required to prorate the child support obligation as each child attained majority, because the child support award was a lump sum for all of the children and the amount was below the guideline amount for the remaining minor children.	Madison	Court of Appeals	01/25/00