Gregory B. Hinton vs. City of Chattanooga
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Doris Sanders v. Samuel Sanders, Jr.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Boardwalk Regency Corp. v. Roy Patterson and Trump Taj Mahal Assoc. v. Roy Patterson
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
Tonya Davis vs. University Phy.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Ronnie Bradfield vs. City of Memphis
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Tammy Kemp vs. Thomas Michael Hale
|
Cumberland | Court of Appeals | |
Martha L. Carter, et al vs. Billy L. King
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Munford Bank vs. American Cas.
|
Tipton | Court of Appeals | |
In the Matter of All Assessments
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In the Matter of Wayne H.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
In the Matter of Wayne H.
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Greeter Construction Co. vs. Tice
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Yona Boyd, et al. v. Donald Bruce, M.D., et al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Linda Mires vs. David Clay
|
Weakley | Court of Appeals | |
In the Matter of Asbert Joseph
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
Stockman vs. Stockman
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Hickory Woods Estates Homeowners Assn. vs. Parman
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Miceli vs. Thompson
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Crabtree vs. Dodd
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
Rocky Michael Bruce and Cheryl Bruce v. Angela Jacobs
This dispute over the custody of a minor child arose after the paternal grandparents filed an intervening petition for child custody. They were granted temporary custody of the child pending a hearing on the matter. After two hearings, the trial court ordered that custody remain with the paternal grandparents pending the results of home studies of each party seeking custody, i.e., the mother and the paternal grandparents. The trial court held additional hearings after receiving the results of the home studies and awarded custody to the paternal grandparents. We affirm the trial court. |
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
Judy Seals vs. Tri-State
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Memphis Pub. vs. Cable Conn.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Ronnie Bradfield, v. Steve Dotson, et al.
This is the third occasion which this Court has had to address the merits of this case. By prior opinions and judgments entered on September 6, 1996, and February 17, 1998, respectively, the Court addressed previous issues on appeal. In the interests of judicial efficiency, the Court adopts and incorporates herein the following recitation of facts contained in our opinion entered in this cause on February 17, 1998: In this case, an inmate at a state correctional institution filed
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Starks vs. Durham
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Jennings vs. Case
|
Court of Appeals |