Mitchell L. Darnall, v. A+ Homecare, Inc., and James Bradley Smith, et al. - Concurring
The court has correctly affirmed the summary judgment dismissing Mr. Darnall’s Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-1-304 (Supp. 1998) claim. Even though I concur with the court’s decision, I have prepared this separate opinion to state my understanding of the elements of a Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-1-304 claim. I find this restatement necessary because of the Western Section’s reliance on Johnson v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 759 S.W.2d 925 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988) in Merryman v. Central Parking Sys., Inc., No. 01A01-9203-CH-00076, 1992 WL 330404 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 1992) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed). |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Theresa G. Jenkins v. Lionel R. Barrett, Jr., and John G. Oliva - Concurring
The appellant states the issue before this Court thus: A single, narrow issue is presented for consideration in this appeal: Does material evidence within the meaning of Rule 13d, appear in the record which suports the jury’s verdict of $140 ,000.00 in compensatory damages, and, if so, did the trial court erroneously grant a new trial? The case history demonstrates that this issue is not properly before the Court for consideration. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Mitchell L. Darnall v. A+ Homecare, Inc. and James D. Smith
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from summary judgment granted to the Defendants in a complaint asserting retaliatory discharge with the action based solely upon Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-1-304. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Charles R. Brown
The appellant, Charles R. Brown, appeals as of right from his conviction for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) by a Blount County jury. The defendant was sentenced to eleven months and twenty-nine days. He was ordered to serve forty-eight hours in the county jail before being placed on supervised probation for eleven months and twenty-seven days. The defendant was also fined $350. In this direct appeal, the defendant presents two issues: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support the finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; and (2) whether the trial court erred in charging the jury. |
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9712-GS-00298
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Planet Rock vs. Regis Ins.
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Little Six Corporation vs. Ruth Johnson, Commissioner
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Buford vs. Cunningham
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Advanced Sales vs. Wilson Co.
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Jenny C. Walker vs. James M. Walker
|
Robertson | Court of Appeals | |
Southers vs. Southers
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
STS/BAC Joint Venture v. The City of Mt. Juliet
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Amy Decker vs. Carroll Academy
|
Carroll | Court of Appeals | |
Tabor vs. Eakin
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Hennigan vs. Hennigan
|
Bedford | Court of Appeals | |
In the Matter of: M.C.G.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
C&C Aluminum Builders Supply vs. Rynd
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Lessley vs. Shope
|
Robertson | Court of Appeals | |
Forklift Systems vs. Werner Enterprises
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Damron vs. Media General et al
|
Lincoln | Court of Appeals | |
Mason et al vs. Metro Development
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Davis vs. Inman, et al
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
Lautenbach vs. Lautenbach
|
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
Estate of Bonnie Spalding
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Marcus vs. Marcus
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals |