Randolph vs. Poteet
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
In re: The Estate of Janet Gail Levine March, Absentee
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9601-CC-00009
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Nathan Lee Colquit
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Knoble vs. Taylor
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Rogers vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Butler vs. Dept. of Correction
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Baldwin et al vs. Pirelli Armstrong et al
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Howse vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Griffin vs. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9804-CV-00145
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9804-CV-00145
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Tn Farmers Mutual Ins. vs. Inman
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Sherer vs. Linginfelter
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ellis vs. Trentham
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Stewart vs. Stewart
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Michelle Ball for herself and next of kind of Miranda K. Ball, Deceased, v. Hamilton County Emergency Medical Services
This civil action was filed by Michelle Ball ("Ms Ball") against Hamilton County Emergency Medical Services ("HCEMS") and others, seeking damages for the wrongful death of Ms. Ball's 16-month-old daughter, Miranda K. Ball ("Miranda"). The suit against HCEMS brought into play the provision of the Govermental Tort Liability Act. Following a bench trial, the court dismissed the complaint as to HCEMS, finding that HCEMS did not have a duty to transport Miranda to the hospital in the face of her mother's decision at the child's condition was not such as to require a trip to the hospital. The court further fond that HCEMS' emergency medical technicians ("the EMTS") did not violate their standard of care by failing to advise Ms. Ball that croup could be life-threatening under certain circumstances. Ms. Ball appealed, raising issues that present the following questions for our determination: |
Court of Appeals | ||
Howell vs. Chase
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Robert D. Fulcher, III and wife, Eleanor Fulcher and Allen-Fulcher Partnership, v. R. Chancellor Allen and H. Stanley Allen, Trustee, and Harwell-Allen Partnership
This appeal involves a dispute between partners. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Robert D. Fulcher III, Eleanor Fulcher, and Allen-Fulcher Partnership, appeal the trial court’s ruling in favor of Appellees, R. Chancellor Allen, H. Stanley Allen, and Harwell-Allen Partnership. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Steven Meredith Garmon v. Fisk University, Henry Ponder, President, Reavis L. Mitchell, Dean of Academic Affairs
A white college professor denied tenure sued his university employer for breach of contract and racial discrimination. The Chancery Court of Davidson County dismissed both claims. We reverse the judgment dismissing the contract claim and affirm the ruling on the discrimination claim. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Vanderbilt University Medical Center v. The County of Macon, Lafayette, Tennessee - Concurring
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (“Vanderbilt”) filed suit in the Chancery Court of Davidson County against Macon County (“County”) seeking a judgment against County in the amount of $20,671.95 for medical services rendered by Vanderbilt in Nashville to an inmate who had been in the custody of County and who had been brought to Vanderbilt for treatment. Both Vanderbilt and County filed motions for summary judgment, supported by affidavit or affidavits. Following a hearing, the chancellor denied County’s summary judgment motion and granted summary judgment in favor of Vanderbilt. On appeal, County has raised two issues which are as follows:
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Underwood vs. Charter Federal
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Gouge vs. Ryan
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9712-CV-
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9805-CV-
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals |