COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

02A01-9707-CH-00157 02A01-9707-CH-00157 Trial Court Judge: W. Michael Maloan	Obion	Court of Appeals	06/30/98
Bradson Mercantile vs. Joseph Crabtree 02A01-9710-CV-00272	Shelby	Court of Appeals	06/30/98
King vs. King 03A01-9710-CH-00441		Court of Appeals	06/29/98
Connatser vs. Connatser 03A01-9801-CV-00005		Court of Appeals	06/29/98
03A01-9712-CV-00532 03A01-9712-CV-00532		Court of Appeals	06/26/98
Judd's vs. Muir 03A01-9801-CH-00002		Court of Appeals	06/26/98
Wilhoite vs. Proffitt 03A01-9801-CH-00004		Court of Appeals	06/26/98
City of Knox vs. Garuin 03A01-9801-CV-00038		Court of Appeals	06/26/98
Moore vs. Feathers 03A01-9802-CV-00063		Court of Appeals	06/26/98
Fye vs. Kennedy 03A01-9707-CV-00287	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	06/26/98
Sanjurjo vs. Woods 03A01-9708-CH-00330		Court of Appeals	06/26/98
Kellogg Co., vs. TN Comm., et al 02A01-9612-CH-00302 Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small	Shelby	Court of Appeals	06/26/98
3A01-9801-CH-00034 3A01-9801-CH-00034		Court of Appeals	06/25/98
3A01-9801-CV-00033 3A01-9801-CV-00033	Sevier	Court of Appeals	06/25/98
Eblen vs. Johnson 03A01-9709-CH-00423		Court of Appeals	06/25/98
Canonie vs. Tennessee 03A01-9710-CH-00481		Court of Appeals	06/25/98
Hankins vs. Seaton 03A01-9710-CV-00468		Court of Appeals	06/25/98
Roach vs. Renfro 03A01-9711-CH-00517		Court of Appeals	06/25/98
Purkey vs. Purkey 03A01-9707-CV-00317		Court of Appeals	06/25/98
Atkins vs. Grooms 03A01-9708-JV-00337		Court of Appeals	06/25/98
Stone vs. Stone M1997-00218-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr. Trial Court Judge: Vernon Neal This appeal involves a former spouse's efforts to extricate himself from the spousal support obligations contained in a marital dissolution agreement. Approximately one year after the entry of the divorce decree approving the agreement, the former husband requested the Chancery Court for Putnam County to set the agreement aside because he did not have independent legal advice and his judgment was impaired by antidepressant medication when he signed the agreement. The trial court modified portions of the decree but did not relieve the former husband of his spousal support obligation. Thereafter, the former husband filed a second motion seeking to terminate or reduce his spousal support obligations because of his former wife's improved financial circumstances. The trial court again declined to relieve the former husband of his obligation to pay spousal support. On this appeal, the former husband renews his argument that he should no longer be required pay spousal support because of his former wife's improved financial circumstance and his own weakened financial condition. We affirm the trial court's decision that the former husband has failed to prove the existence of a substantial, material change in circumstances that would warrant modifying his spousal support obligation.	Putnam	Court of Appeals	06/23/98
Albert Gregurek v. Swope Motors M2002-02854-COA-R3-CV Trial Court Judge: J. Curtis Smith This case involves an interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction and/or Motion for Summary Judgment. We reverse.	Marion	Court of Appeals	06/22/98
Lyle vs. Michaelson Asset Management 01A01-9710-CV-00549 Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz	Davidson	Court of Appeals	06/19/98
01A01-9606-CV-00260 01A01-9606-CV-00260 Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell	Williamson	Court of Appeals	06/19/98
Simmons, M.D. vs. Johnson 01A01-9709-CH-00495 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	06/19/98