Jeanie Dianne (White) Hannah vs. Gary Hannah & Carl Hannah
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Wall vs. City of Paris, TN
|
Henry | Court of Appeals | |
James Gatlin vs. Deanna Gatlin
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
Worther Williams vs. Robert Steward
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9708-CH-00417
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Lessley vs. Shope, Jr.
|
Robertson | Court of Appeals | |
Postelle vs. Snead, d/b/a: Emergency Chiro.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Knight vs. Lancaster
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9806-CH-00304
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Susan Todd/State vs. Weakley Co.
|
Weakley | Court of Appeals | |
Sarah Wilkerson vs. Robert Wilkerson
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Ernestine Cole vs. State of TN
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Mark S. Tidman and Evelyn J. Tidman v. The Salvation Army, Bertha Worthy, Kenneth E. Brewer, Fred Ruth - Concuring
Two former Salvation Army officers, a husband and wife who had been demoted and discharged, sued their superior officers and The Salvation Army itself for invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and outrageous conduct. The Circuit Court of Davidson County dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm, and hold, in addition, that the defendants’ actions were protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Allen vs. Wiseman
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Donoho vs. Donoho, Jr.
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Nashville Electric Service vs. Stone
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Harpeth Valley Utilities Dist., vs. Metro. Gov't.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Willis, et. al. vs. Franklin Co. Bd. of Education
|
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
Trail vs. Transportation Management Svcs., et. al.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Bennie Day and Karen Day, v. City of Dercherd, Otis B. Smith, Jr., Mayor, Hank Weddington, Bill van Hoosier, Frank Green, and Daryl Doney, Commissioners - Concurring
I concur i the resulst of the majority opinion, but would base that result on different reasoning. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Thomasson vs. Thomasson
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Irvin vs. Johnson
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Reinhart vs. Parks
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Bursack vs. Wilson
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Bess & Cummins vs. Associated Brokers
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals |
