Emma Clark vs. Randy Perry
|
Crockett | Court of Appeals | |
Bryant vs. Bryant
|
Giles | Court of Appeals | |
Lorrie Murphy vs. Jessica Chadwell
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Cynthia Phillips vs. Francis Perot
|
Dyer | Court of Appeals | |
Cynthia Phillips vs. Francis Perot
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Harry Luther vs. Billy Compton, et al
|
Lake | Court of Appeals | |
Arp vs. Arp
|
Court of Appeals | ||
First American National Bank vs. Alexander & Betty Smith
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Morris v. Columbia Construction
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9709-CV-00206
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Less, Getz & Lipman vs. Rainbow Entertainment
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Elizabeth Bates vs. Robert Bates
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Potter's Home Center, Inc., D/B/A Potter's Home Center, v. Lauren Dale Tucker, and Wilburn R. Viles, Sr., and wife Mildred E. Viles, and the Guaranty Title Company, and First American National Bank
Potter’s Home Center appeals the trial court’s summary judgment which dismissed its suit to enforce a materialman’s lien against Defendants/Appellees Wilburn R. Viles, Sr., and Mildred E. Viles. We affirm the trial court’s judgment based on our conclusion that Potter’s failed to comply with the applicable notice requirements of the mechanics’ and materialmen’s lien statutes. |
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
The Town of Collierville, Tennessee, Schilling, Inc., Jane Porter Feild, and Joel H. Porter, v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company appeals the trial court’s orders of |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Rickye D. Anderson v. L. Lois Anderson
Appellant has filed a petition to rehear which, after due consideration is respectfully denied. |
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Van Adrian Barker v. Patsy Lou (Randolph) Sledd Barker - Concurring
In this divorce case, the husband Van Adrian Barker has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court declaring the parties to be divorced under TCA § 36-4-129, and dividing the marital estate. The appellant presents only the following issue: I. Whether the Chancellor erred in finding that the husband did not substantially contribute to the appreciation of the rental property owned by the wife, thereby denying the husband a share in that appreciation. |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Van Adrian Barker v. Patsy Lou (Randolph) Sledd Barker - Concurring
I concur with the court’s opinion for two reasons. First, the expenses associated with the upkeep of the Gail Drive house were more than off-set by the rental income from the house. Second, the increase in the value of the house was due, not to Mr. Barker’s contributions to the maintenance of the house which were de minimis, but to the appreciation in the value of real property in general. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Sidney Tillman Hoover, v. Daniel Edmondson Hoover
This is a divorce case. Defendant-appellant Daniel Hoover appeals the trial court’s division of marital property and asserts that the land containing the parties marital home was improperly classified as wife’s separate property. Plaintiff-appellee Sidney Hoover asserts that the trial court erred in failing to award her one-half of Husband’s retirement account. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
City of Murfreesboro v. Mariann M. Worthington, City of Murfreesboro v. Thomas W. Worthington and wife, Mariann M. Worthington
Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing of Plaintiff/Appellant City of Murfreesboro, the petition is denied. |
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
In the matter of: Joel Kristen Sipe, State of Tennessee, Dept. of Childrens Services v. Bruce Sipe and Laurel Sipe
This is a termination of parental rights case. The minor child in question is Joel Kristen Sipe, born September 7, 1995 to Laurel Sipe (“Mother”) and Bruce Sipe (“Father”). The trial court terminated the parental rights of both parents as to this child after finding on clear and convincing evidence that grounds existed to do so. Both parents have appealed. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Bobby Blackmon, v. Steven F. Glaser
The plaintiff, Bobby Blackmon, has appealed from a judgment reading as follows: The Motion to Set Pretrial Management Conference is overruled. This order shall be considered as a final judgment disposing of any claim, right or liability of any party as contemplated by T.R.A.P. Rule 3(a). IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of March, 1996. |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Ronald E. Nelson v., James P. Everett, et al.
Plaintiff/Appellant, Ronald E. Nelson (“Nelson”) appeals the judgment of the trial court granting defendants/appellees’, James P. Everett (“Everett”) and Memphis Publishing Company, Inc., d/b/a The Commercial Appeal (“Memphis Publishing Company”) (collectively “defendants”), motion for summary judgment. For reasons stated hereinafter, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Patricia Herndon, Next of Kin of Warren G. Price, Deceased, v. Michael and Jeanette Hughes, and Jeff McAlpin, D/B/A Pyramid Motors and McAlpin Enterprises
This appeal involves an automobile accident and the subsequent wrongful death action brought by the daughter of the decedent. Plaintiff-appellant, Patricia Herndon, filed suit against |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Meese & Associates, Inc., v. Eddie Powers and David Hicks, Rebecca Car Kirklin, v. Meese Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff, Meese & Associates, Inc. (“plaintiff”), appeals the judgment of the trial court 2 awarding Intervening Plaintiff/Appellee, Rebecca Kirklin (“Kirklin”), the real estate commission for the sale of Defendants/Appellees’, Eddie Powers (“Powers”) and David Hicks (“Hicks”) (collectively “defendants”), property by Kirklin. For reasons stated hereinafter, we reverse the decision of the trial court and remand. |
Campbell | Court of Appeals |