Larry Morgan d/b/a Morgan Contracting vs. Tellico Plains E2001-02733-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Lawrence H. Puckett
In this contract dispute, the Plaintiff, Morgan Contracting, Inc. ("Morgan") sued the Town of Tellico Plains, alleging that it was due $68,464.86 under the terms of the contract. Tellico Plains answered with the defense that Morgan's claim was time-barred under the sixty-day limitations period set forth in the contract. After a non-jury trial, the Court ruled that Morgan had not filed suit within the contractual limitations period and consequently dismissed Morgan's cause of action. On appeal, Morgan argues that the Trial Court erred in not finding that Tellico Plains waived its right to rely upon the contractual limitations period provision. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.
Monroe
Court of Appeals
Cheryl Nichols v. Transcor America M2001-01889-COA-R9-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley
A female prisoner who was allegedly raped by an employee of TransCor America, Inc., an inmate transportation company, brought suit against the company for negligence and breach of contract. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the defendant company on the negligence claim, ruling among other things that it is not a common carrier under Tennessee law. The court also denied the company's motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff's contract claim. Both parties filed applications for an interlocutory appeal, which we granted. We affirm the trial court as to both issues.
Richard Taylor vs Steven Burleson E2001-02381-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Thomas J. Seeley, Jr.
In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiffs lot owners, sought to invalidate subdivision restrictive covenants on grounds other lot owners had violated the restrictions. The Trial Court refused. We affirm.
Washington
Court of Appeals
Dairy Gold vs. Michael Thomas E2001-02463-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Frank Brown, III
In this dispute over a commercial lease, the Chancellor entered Judgment for lessor for limited rents, taxes and attorney's fees. On appeal, we affirm. In this dispute over a commercial lease, the Chancellor entered Judgment for lessor for limited rents, taxes and attorney's fees. On appeal, we affirm.
Hamilton
Court of Appeals
Kasiea Chance vs. Carl Gibson E2001-02836-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Jeffrey D. Rader
This is a suit by Kasiea Delawn Chance, adult daughter of Kayla D. Leonard, and Ms. Leonard, who joins in the prosecution of this suit against Carl Dennis Gibson, Jr., seeking to establish his paternity as to Ms. Chance and recover support from the date of Ms. Chance's birth, medical expenses incident thereto, and attorney fees. We affirm in part; vacate in part and remand.
Sevier
Court of Appeals
Jonathan H. vs. James Stewart E2001-02485-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: William E. Lantrip
This is a suit brought by Jonathan H., through his mother and next friend, Lisa S., and Lisa S., individually, seeking by means of a writ of certiorari and supercedes, to reverse a determination of the Anderson County School Board expelling Jonathan H. for one year because the Board found that he had violated its zero tolerance policy by possessing drugs on a school campus. We vacate the judgment below, dismiss the appeal and remand.
Anderson
Court of Appeals
Guy R. Jenkins, et al vs. Dan Gibbs E2001-01802-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Sharon J. Bell
After a dispute arose over the ownership of 1000 shares of stock in City Bonding Company ("City Bonding"), Guy Jenkins and Aubrey Allen Jenkins ("Plaintiffs") sued Dan Gibbs ("Defendant") seeking a determination as to how many shares of stock were owned by the various parties. Guy Jenkins also claimed Gibbs unlawfully procured the breach of a contract Guy Jenkins had with City Bonding. The trial court granted Gibbs summary judgment on the unlawful procurement of breach of contract claim. After a trial on the remaining issues, the trial court determined Gibbs owned 490 shares of stock, Guy Jenkins owned 255 shares, and the remaining 255 shares were unissued. All parties appealed the trial court's determination with respect to ownership of the stock. Guy Jenkins also appealed the granting of summary judgment on his claim against Gibbs for unlawful procurement of breach of contract. We vacate the summary judgment granted to Gibbs and affirm the judgment in all other respects.
Knox
Court of Appeals
Donald Tangwall vs. Patrick Stapleton E2001-02121-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
Plaintiff filed a Petition in bankruptcy and subsequently filed suit in Circuit Court, claiming damages against defendants. The Trial Court dismissed plaintiff's action. On appeal, we affirm.
Blount
Court of Appeals
Mary Trew, d/b/a Trew's Wrecker vs. David Haggard E2001-02183-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Russell E. Simmons, Jr.
Trew's Wrecker Service and the Roane County Sheriff's Department entered into an oral contract regarding towing and storage services for vehicles seized by the Sheriff's Department in drug interdiction and DUI enforcement matters. The parties dispute many of the terms of the oral contract, including how much Trew's Wrecker Service was to be paid for towing and storage and when the Sheriff's Department was required to hold a sale of the seized vehicles in order to clear the wrecker service lot. Mary Trew, d/b/a Trew's Wrecker Service ("Plaintiff"), sued the Roane County Sheriff's Department and Sheriff David B. Haggard ("Defendants") for "breach of contract, and benefits conferred." The Trial Court awarded damages based upon a $45 per vehicle towing and storage charge for 83 vehicles. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
Jerry Walker v. Ricky White M2001-02438-COA-R9-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: John D. Wootten, Jr.
This is an interlocutory appeal by permission which raises issues of first impression concerning the federal Right to Financial Privacy Act and the Tennessee Financial Records Privacy Act. We first must determine whether state courts retain concurrent jurisdiction to resolve claims brought against a bank by its customer arising under the federal Act. We hold that federal court jurisdiction under the Act is permissive. State courts therefore retain concurrent jurisdiction over such claims. We further hold that the Tennessee Financial Records Privacy Act is not applicable to federal agencies which issue subpoenas for bank records. The furnishing of information pursuant to a subpoena issued by a federal agency is governed in Tennessee by the federal Right to Financial Privacy Act. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order denying summary judgment on these issues to the Defendant.
Macon
Court of Appeals
Carolyn Jones v. TennCare M2001-01065-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
Beginning in 1994, the Bureau of TennCare ("TennCare") provided insurance coverage for home health services for one its enrollees, Carolyn Jones ("Jones"), who is bed-ridden due to rheumatoid arthritis. In 1997, TennCare denied Jones coverage for home health services, and Jones appealed this determination. The Administrative Law Judge held TennCare was not required to provide coverage for home health services to Jones because the services are not medically necessary for her. Under the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, Jones appealed the administrative agency's determination to the Chancery Court of Davidson County ("Trial Court") which affirmed the determination. Jones now appeals to this Court. We affirm.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Frank Porter v. Ralph Freedle M2001-01892-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Walter C. Kurtz
This appeal involves a dispute over a roadway easement and interests in the use of a spring and springhouse. The chancery court determined that appellants abandoned the interest in the roadway easement and access to a spring and springhouse and dismissed appellants' suit for an injunction. Appellants challenge the chancery court's decision that the rights were abandoned. As discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the chancery court that there was clear, unequivocal evidence that appellants abandoned any interest.
Robertson
Court of Appeals
James Kelley v. John Cage M2001-00702-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Jane W. Wheatcraft
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes
This appeal involves the granting of a summary judgment motion in a medical malpractice case. The issue is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment on the basis that there was never a physician/patient relationship between the decedent, Lillie Donnette Kelley, and Dr. John Cage, a cardiologist, and an employee of Mid-State Cardiology Associates, P.C..
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Patrick McGee v. Timothy Best M2001-01365-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
This case involves the termination of membership and employment of a member of an LLC. The terminated member and employee filed suit against the LLC and the other members thereof alleging breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty, civil conspiracy, unfair competition, fraud, and misrepresentation. The trial court granted defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings as to all claims except the claim for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Thereafter, the trial court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on the remaining two claims. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm, modify, reverse in part, and remand.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
David Stovall v. Christopher Dunn M1999-00200-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton
This appeal involves a state prisoner's civil rights action against a private lawyer appointed to represent him in a post-conviction proceeding. The prisoner filed suit against his former lawyer in the Circuit Court for Maury County alleging that the lawyer, motivated by racial bias, had intentionally deprived him of an opportunity to seek appellate review of an adverse decision of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals and had refused to provide him with his case file. The lawyer moved for summary judgment on the ground that the prisoner's complaint was barred by the statute of limitations. The trial court granted the summary judgment, and the prisoner has appealed. We have determined that the trial court erred by granting the summary judgment because there is a genuine factual issue regarding whether the prisoner's complaint is time-barred.
Discount Communications, Inc. purchases telephone services from BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. and resells the services at an increased rate to Discount's own residential and commercial customers. Some of Discount's customers qualify for a Federal Communication Commission program called Lifeline, which provides telephone services at a reduced rate through federal and state subsidies. BellSouth and Discount got into a dispute about whether their agreement required BellSouth (1) to provide directory assistance to Discount's customers and (2) to pass the $3.50 per month state subsidy through to Discount. The Tennessee Regulatory Authority decided that the agreement required BellSouth to provide directory assistance at no charge to Discount's customers and that BellSouth was not required to forward the $3.50 monthly charge to Discount. We affirm.
Petitioner, an inmate in custody of the Tennessee Department of Correction, filed a petition for writ of certiorari seeking judicial review of a disciplinary hearing wherein the inmate was found guilty of assault and strong arm activity and received a deduction of one-year in good time and was upgraded to maximum security. The trial court granted respondent's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. We affirm.
This appeal arises from a dispute over the custody of Austin Bombard, a minor child, and the termination of George Bombard's parental rights on a finding of abandonment. The trial court dismissed the father's Petition for Custody and granted custody of the child to Jocelyn and Michael Baral, the child's maternal aunt and uncle. Mr. Bombard challenges the termination of his parental rights and the trial court's custody order. We affirm the trial court's termination of the father's parental rights and custody order. Costs of this appeal shall be assessed to the appellant.
This appeal challenges the dismissal of a defendant. The circuit court granted John Cook's Tenn. R. Civ. P. 41.02 motion for involuntary dismissal and found that he did not personally guarantee the debt of Bennett Hill Spring, LLC when he signed the Credit Application as "Operations Manager." Appellant challenges the circuit court's decision to grant the motion which dismissed John Cook as an individual defendant. As discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court granting John Cook's motion for involuntary dismissal. The circuit court was correct that, from a reading of the contract as a whole, it is not apparent that John Cook personally guaranteed payment by signing the Credit Application.
The Trial Court dismissed plaintiff's action, pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 41.02, for failure to pay costs which had been assessed as a sanction. On appeal, we affirm, as modified.
Coffee
Court of Appeals
Kelley McEvoy v. Kimberly Brewer M2001-02054-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: C. L. Rogers
This appeal involves the custody of a seven-year-old girl. Her parents initially agreed to joint custody in their marital dissolution agreement that was approved by the General Sessions Court for Sumner County. Both parties later petitioned for sole custody. The general sessions court determined that the father should be the child's primary custodial parent because the mother had married a man who posed a credible threat of domestic abuse or violence toward the child and because the existing alternating custody arrangement was no longer workable. The mother asserts on this appeal that the evidence does not support the general sessions court's decision to change custody. We have determined that the evidence does not preponderate against the court's decision to modify the custody arrangement and to award the father primary physical custody of the child.
Sumner
Court of Appeals
Karen Gale Engel v. Jerry Burton Young, Sr. M2001-00734-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Clara W. Byrd
This appeal arose after a paternity and custody proceeding was resolved by the trial court in which custody of the child was granted to Mother and visitation was granted in part to Father and in part to the child's half-siblings, Father's adult daughters. Mother appeals, arguing that the third party visitation order violates her constitutional rights as a parent and that she should have been awarded the tax deduction for the child. Because the trial court was incorrect in ordering the third party visitation, we reverse that portion of the trial court's decision which awarded visitation to the child's half-siblings. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the tax deduction to Father, we affirm that portion of the trial court's decision. We also decline to award Mother attorney's fees on appeal
