COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Montz vs. Montz 01A01-9812-CV-00635 Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley	Davidson	Court of Appeals	06/29/99
Dotson vs. TDOC 01A01-9811-CV-00596		Court of Appeals	06/29/99
Butler vs. TDOC 01A01-9808-CH-00428		Court of Appeals	06/29/99
Baker vs. Mundaca Investment Corp. 01A01-9809-CH-00498 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	06/29/99
Lemay vs. State 01A01-9807-CH-00397 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	06/29/99
Simpson vs. Bicentennial Volunteers 01A01-9809-CV-00493 Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes	Davidson	Court of Appeals	06/29/99
Estate of Francis Logwood 03A01-9902-PB-00042		Court of Appeals	06/25/99
Nationsbank, N.A. vs. FormPak, Inc. & Ron Campbell 03A01-9808-CH-00279		Court of Appeals	06/25/99
Nationsbank, N.A. vs. FormPak, Inc. & Ron Campbell 03A01-9808-CH-00279		Court of Appeals	06/25/99
Kinsler vs. State 03A01-9810-BC-00362 Trial Court Judge: Inman		Court of Appeals	06/25/99
Howard vs. Howard 03A01-9811-CV-00374		Court of Appeals	06/25/99
Grissim vs. Powell Const. 03A01-9807-CV-00222		Court of Appeals	06/25/99
Killion vs. Killion 03A01-9807-CH-00229		Court of Appeals	06/25/99
Eddie Dorris, et al vs. Jeffery Crisp M2000-02170-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain Trial Court Judge: Don Ash Over four months after signing a surrender of her parental rights and consent for her minor child to be adopted, Appellee filed a Petition to Set Aside Surrender on the basis of a procedural defect. The Chancellor held that Appellee had abandoned the child, that the surrender executed by Appellee on June 24, 1999 should be set aside because there was no home study performed prior to the surrender, and dismissed the petitions for adoption. The Chancellor ordered the child returned to the custody of Appellee, which order was stayed by this Court September 19, 2000. The adoptive parents appeal raising the following issues for consideration: (1) Whether the mother has standing to attack the surrender on the basis of a lack of a home study, (2) whether the surrender is valid, and (3) whether the trial court was limited to the criteria set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113(h) in determining whether termination of parental rights was in the child's best interests. We reverse and find the surrender valid.	Rutherford	Court of Appeals	06/24/99
Gillman vs. Loudon City Commission 03A01-9706-CH-00239		Court of Appeals	06/24/99
Poindexter vs. Strang 03A01-9810-CH-00323		Court of Appeals	06/24/99
Con Pac South vs. Burnett 03A01-9811-CV-00389		Court of Appeals	06/24/99
Cobb vs. Beier 03A01-9812-CV-00399		Court of Appeals	06/24/99
Englewood Citizens vs. Town of Englewood 03A01-9803-CH-00098		Court of Appeals	06/24/99
Bowlin vs. Bowlin 03A01-9807-CV-00243	Hamblen	Court of Appeals	06/24/99
Clay vs. Smith 01A01-9811-CV-00577 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Davidson	Court of Appeals	06/23/99
Ciangi vs. Ciangi 01A01-9805-CV-00236 Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson	Davidson	Court of Appeals	06/23/99
01A01-9806-CV-00274 01A01-9806-CV-00274 Trial Court Judge: William B. Cain	Wayne	Court of Appeals	06/23/99
Parr vs. Tower Management 01A01-9811-CV-00573 Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III	Rutherford	Court of Appeals	06/23/99
Douglas Radant vs. Robert Earwood 02A01-9802-CV-00029 Trial Court Judge: Kay S. Robilio	Shelby	Court of Appeals	06/22/99