Town of Huntsville, Tennessee, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Tennessee, and Stanlodge, LLC., v. William I. Duncan, Richard Smith, Luke Coffey, James R. Potter
This litigation originated when the Town of Huntsville (“Huntsville”) and Stanlodge, LLC (“Stanlodge”), filed suit challenging the constitutionality of Chapter 1101 of the Public Acts of 1998. The plaintiffs specifically contest Section 9(f)(3)1 of Chapter 1101, which permits certain territoriesto hold incorporation elections even though these territories do not satisfy the minimum requirements for such elections as set forth in the general law. See T.C.A. § 6-1-201 (1998). On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants, finding that Section 9(f)(3) is constitutional. Huntsville and Stanlodge appeal, raising five issues: |
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
Drake vs. Manson, et al
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9809-CH-00504
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Opryland Hotel vs. Millbrook Distribution Svcs.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Cumberland Bend Investors vs. Ambrose Printing
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Jo Ann Forman, Inc. et al vs. Nat'l Council on Compensation
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
Turner vs. Campbell
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
Taylor vs. Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hulshof vs. Hulshof
|
Marshall | Court of Appeals | |
In re: The Adoption of female child, E.N.R.
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
Wagner vs. Gaston
|
Sequatchie | Court of Appeals | |
Lattimer vs. TDOC
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Davis vs. Computer Maintenance Svc.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Eldridge vs. Eldridge
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Eldridge vs. Eldridge
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Haywood vs. Haywood
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Nickelson vs. Sumner Co. Bd. of Ed.
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Sherlock vs. Kwik Sak, et al
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Fred W. Kincaid, Jr.
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Zonge vs. Woodall
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9910-CH-00039
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Oaks vs. Oaks
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Sandusky vs. Sandusky
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
Anthony Bryan Jennette, v. Teresa Lynn Jennette
In this divorce case the husband appeals the trial court’s division of marital property and the order of child support. We affirm the trial court’s order. |
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Stewart vs. State
|
Court of Appeals |