Hobbs vs. Hobbs
|
Bedford | Court of Appeals | |
Byrd vs. Dept. of Corrections
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Smith vs. Bridgestone/Firestone
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Blackmon vs. Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Davis vs. Davis
|
Unicoi | Court of Appeals | |
Anderson vs. Anderson
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Stafford vs. Stafford
|
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
Nations Bank N.A. South, v. Millington Homes Investors, LTD.
This is an action to collect 21 promissory notes executed by the defendant in 1985, 1986, and 1987, payable to USA Fairfield Realty Fund, LTD. and assigned to Citizens Federal Bank, N.A., on order, on December 20, 1991, without recourse. Appendix A is a diagrammatic explanation of the commercial lineage of the defendant. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Russell vs. Mid-South Insurance et al
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Turner vs. TN Board of Paroles
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Oakley (Wilson) vs. Wilson
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Allen vs. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Smith vs. Donal Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Baldwin et al vs. Pirelli Armstrong et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Barbara Jordan vs. Sofamor S.N.C.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9804-CV-
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Bradson Mercantile vs. Joseph Crabtree
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Joleen Creson vs. Tammy Creson
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
McNairy Co. vs. John Sellers
|
McNairy | Court of Appeals | |
Schleicher vs. Founders Security Life Ins. Co.
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
In the matter of: Kristalena Kay Smith et al
|
White | Court of Appeals | |
Worth vs. Cumberland Mt. Property Owners
|
Cumberland | Court of Appeals | |
D.D. Roberts, D/B/A Roberts Construction Co., et al. v.Tommy Yarbrough, et al., Thomas Lumber Co., Inc. v. Naran Patel, et al., and Tommy Yarbrough, et al.
Two subcontractors recovered judgments for work done on a construction project in Clarksville. On appeal the general contractor and the surety on his bond allege that the appellees were not licensed contractors and that neither complied with the notice of nonpayment statute. In addition, the appellant disputes the trial court’s version of the proof and the award of prejudgment interest. We affirm the trial court. |
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Gordon Carroll and Ora Hall, v. John W. Belcher and Frankie Belcher
This appeal involves an easement for ingress and egress. The defendants, John and Frankie Belcher (Belcher), appeal the decision of the trial court granting the plaintiffs, Gordon Carroll (Carroll) and Ora Hall (Hall), the right to widen an easement running over their property. |
Wilson | Court of Appeals |