Gross vs. Schoenbeck
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Colwell vs. Traughber
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Flightless-N-Bird Farm vs. Dughman
|
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
Hawkins vs. Sundquist
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Peck vs. Mills et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Williams vs. TDOC
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hogan et al vs. Coyne International Enterprises Corp.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Baker vs Maples
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ruth/Raymond Wells vs. J.C Penny
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Dennis/Cheryl Caire vs. McLemore Food Stores
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Brooks vs Brooks, Jr.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Alexander vs Armentrout, Jr.
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
Spruce vs Spruce
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Clark & Associates Architects, Inc. vs. Lewis
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Edmondson vs. Solomon
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hampton vs. TN Truck Sales
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Sara Evelyn Evans (Young) v. Bobby Hugh Young, D.K. Hailey Wrecking Company, Inc. and Levy Industrial Contractors, Inc.
Intervenors D. K. Hailey WreckingCompany (Hailey Wrecking) and Levy Industrial Contractors, Inc. (Levy Industrial) appeal an order of the trial court requiring them to pay the attorney fees of Plaintiff Sara Evelyn Evans incurred in a proceeding to enforce a judgment obtained by Ms. Evans against Bobby Hugh Young. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the ruling of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Palmer vs. So. Central Correctional Facility Disciplinary Bd.
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
R & E Properties vs Jones
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Woods vs Walldorf
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Memphis Housing Auth. vs. Ramona Stewart
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Bryant vs. McCord, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9805-CH-00258
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9711-CV-00685
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Vernon W. Mauldin v. Tennessee Department of Correction
This appeal involves a state prisoner's efforts to obtain judicial review of the length of his incarceration. The prisoner contends that he is entitled to the benefit of the 1989 Sentencing Reform Act’s lesser sentence for armed robbery rather than the sentence imposed upon him at the time of his conviction in 1985. He also contends he is entitled, as a matter of law, to certain sentence reduction credits. Finally, he contends that, taken together, the downward adjustments of his sentence on the basis of these two contentions would entitle him to be immediately released from custody. He filed a Petition for Declaratory Order with the Department of Correction, and the Department denied him relief. Thereafter, the prisoner filed a pro se "Petition for Judicial Review and/or Petition for a Declaratory Judgment and/or Petition for Common-law Writ of Certiorari" in the Chancery Court of Davidson County. The trial court granted the Department's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12.02(6) of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm the dismissal of the prisoner's petition because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |