First Tennessee Bank National Association, v. C.T. Resorts Company, Inc., C. Gary Triggs, and James C. Childers
This appeal is from a summary judgment granted to plaintiff against defendants by the Trial Judge. Essentially, defendants insist that the record contains evidence of misrepresentations of the value of the property by plaintiff’s agents, which was 1Triggs’ and Childers’ earlier affidavits apparently claim that Stooksbury showed them both Smith appraisals. Their later affidavits, however, refer only to the second Smith appraisal. 2 purchased by defendants, and that these representations are actionable under their counter-claims. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee Department of Children's Services v. Yvonne Bardin - Concurring
The parental rights of Yvonne Bardin were terminated by the Juvenile Court of Hamilton County and she appeals. Four (4) children are involved. The issue presented for review is whether the evidence is clear and convincing. We find that it is and affirm. |
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Dan Lomax vs. JMCGH
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Donald D'Amico vs. James Davenport, et al
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Engenius Entertainment vs. W. W. Herenton, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
John Tigrett vs. Union Planters Bank
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Fortunes vs. Watson
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
Cook vs. Brookside
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Volunteer Beer, Inc. vs. Johnson, Jr.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State Dept. of Children Svcs vs. Manier
|
Cannon | Court of Appeals | |
Shofner vs. Red Food Stores (TN)
|
Bedford | Court of Appeals | |
Pait vs. City of Gatlinburg
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Whittle-Wolfe vs. Wolfe
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Mullins vs. Mullins
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Cofer vs. Cofer
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Alcazar vs. Hayes
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Meader
|
Bledsoe | Court of Appeals | |
Poats vs. Nelson
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
First American vs. Fitzgerald
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Marcella J. Cheek, v. Margaret Culpepper, Commissioner of Employment Security and Galen Internal Medicine Group, P.C.
The Appeals Tribunal and the Board of Review held that this appellee was disqualified to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily quit her job without good cause. Judicial review was sought by the appellee, and the decision of the Board of Review was reversed by the Chancellor, who found that “there was no substantial evidence to support the finding of fact that the petitioner’s shift change was temporary.” The employer appeals and presents for review the propriety of the reversal of the decision of the Board of Review. |
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Charles Riggan vs. William Askew
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Charles Riggan vs. William Askew
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Joe Williams vs. Mary Duck
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Joe Williams vs. Mary Duck
|
Madison | Court of Appeals |