COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Turtle Creek Apts. vs. Polk
01A01-9608-CV-00382
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Dillon vs. State
01A01-9701-BC-00020

Robins vs. Flagship Airlines, Inc. & AMR Corp
01A01-9612-CV-00550
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

The City of White House vs. Whitley, et. al.
01A01-9612-CH-00571
Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray

The City of White House vs. Whitley, et. al.
01A01-9612-CH-00571

Hunter vs. Anderson
01A01-9701-CV-00024
Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall

Ruff vs. Traughber
01A01-9702-CH-00074
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Tomlinson vs. Traughber
01A01-9703-CH-00143
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Flowers vs. Metro Baptist Schools
01A01-9705-CH-00219
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Gates, Duncan & Vancamp Co., et al vs. Richard Levantino
02A01-9605-CH-00095

Marles Flowers vs. Memphis Housing Authority
02A01-9610-CV-00240
Trial Court Judge: Wyeth Chandler

Susan Turner v. Jeffrey Purvis
M2002-00023-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Michael R. Jones
Mother appeals from a trial court modification of the custody and visitation arrangement which had been in place since the divorce in 1997. The previous arrangement gave Mother primary residential custody, and Father was to have liberal visitation as agreed upon by the parties. After declining to adopt the parenting plan submitted by either Mother or Father, the trial court devised a plan establishing a specific residential schedule. Mother argues that there was not a material change of circumstances that warranted the trial court's decision. Because we determine that a material change in circumstances occurred and because the modification of the custody arrangement was in the best interests of the children, we affirm the decision of the trial court.

Henderson vs. Harlan, d/b/a: Lodge Quarters
01A01-9610-CV-00463
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Jammi vs. Conley
01A01-9609-CH-00425
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Bain vs. City of Murfreesboro
01A01-9611-CV-00510
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Wood vs. Prosser, et. al.
01A01-9510-CV-00468
Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley

Aghili vs. Saadatnejadi
01A01-9605-CV-00214
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Than Those Articulated By The Majority. The Majority Relies Upon State v. Marshall,
03C01-9602-CC-00066
Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb

Glenda Whisenhunt vs. Gordon Whisenhunt
02A01-9506-CV-00126
Trial Court Judge: James E. Swearengen

David Dunnehew vs. Donna Dunnehew
02A01-9604-CH-00079

Pacific Properties, v. Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, v. Michael S. Stalcup
03A01-9701-CV-00020
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge: Judge William R. Holt, Jr.

This action for conversion was submitted to a jury which returned a general verdict for the plaintiff, thereby implicitly finding that the fact-driven principal defense of the Statute of Limitations was not well-taken. Home Federal appeals and presents for review issues which, as paraphrased, question the propriety of the submission of the case to the jury, whether the defense of Statute of Limitations was well-taken, as a matter of law, whether requested jury instructions should have been given and whether the drawer of a check adequately instructed the drawee Bank as to its disposition. Pacific Properties

Thelma W. Kelley, v. John E. Vance and Betty L. Vance, and Allstate Insurance Company
03A01-9701-CV-00031
Authoring Judge: Justice Herschel Pickens Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Ben W. Hooper, II

In this action, plaintiff seeks uninsured motorist coverage from her insurance company, and the Trial Court, responding to motion for summary judgment, granted judgment to defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Plaintiff has appealed.

Aeyon Cho v. Dae-Young Jeong - Concurring
03A01-9608-CV-00257
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bill Swan

We granted the application of Dae-Young Jeong (Husband) for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 9, T.R.A.P., to consider whether the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction to grant his wife, the plaintiff Aeyon Cho (Wife), an absolute divorce.

Whitney Leigh Davidson, Minor Child, by next friend, Rozan Davidson, v. Donna Wright, et al.
03A01-9702-CH-00051
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor William Everett Lantripp

The Knox County Board of Education adopted a policy against the possession of weapons on school campuses for the school year beginning in September 1995. Whitney Leigh Davidson was provided a copy of the West High School Handbook which explained the policy and the consequences of its violation. On January 23, 1996, while a junior at West High School, she was suspended for a violation of the policy. Following a series of administrative hearings the Board of Education held a plenary hearing and upheld the decision to expel Ms Davidson for one year. Judicial review resulted in a finding that the Board had not acted arbitrarily, illegally or beyond its jurisdiction in expelling Ms. Davidson.