COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

State vs. Victor Reynolds
02C01-9607-CR-00244
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

State vs. Jerry Hardin
02C01-9609-CC-00303
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

State vs. Bobby Anderson
02C01-9602-CC-00068
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

State vs. William Bell
02C01-9608-CR-00275
Trial Court Judge: Bernie Weinman

State vs. Joe Patrick Sr.
02C01-9608-CC-00269
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

02C01-9608-CC-00283
02C01-9608-CC-00283

State vs. Tony Higgs
02C01-9610-CC-00360
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

State vs. Heather Dowdy
02C01-9610-CR-00348
Trial Court Judge: Bernie Weinman

Loftus vs. Loftus, Jr.
01A01-9702-PB-00066
Trial Court Judge: Frank G. Clement, Jr.

Tennessee Teachers Credit Union vs. Orr
01A01-9701-CV-00005
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

State., ex. rel. Shaver vs. Shaver
01A01-9610-CV-00474
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Laney vs. Campbell, Commissioner
01A01-9703-CH-00142
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Rudy Rogers vs. Gerald & Tony Young
02A01-9604-CH-00081
Trial Court Judge: John Walton West

02A01-611-CV-00267
02A01-611-CV-00267
Trial Court Judge: D'Army Bailey

Fred Dean vs. Donal Campbell, et al
02A01-9704-CV-00077
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

Jenkins vs. Jenkins
01A01-9609-CV-00399
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins

Southeast Drilling & Blasting Services vs. BRS Construction Co.
01A01-9706-CH-00272
Trial Court Judge: Don R. Ash

Curtis vs. Curtis
01A01-9508-CV-00385
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Droussoitis vs. Damrron, et. al.
01A01-9612-CV-00548
Trial Court Judge: J. S. Daniel

Reliance Insurance Co. vs. WSN Leasing, Inc.
01A01-9612-CV-00552
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Brothers

Tomlin, a minor., et. al. vs. Warren,
01A01-9702-CV-00067
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

State vs. Gray
M1998-00256-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Gale B. Robinson
The sole remaining question in this appeal is whether in October of 1998 the General Sessions Court of Davidson County had jurisdiction over a contempt warrant issued for violating the Davidson County Circuit Court's order of protection. We affirm the General Sessions Court's exercise of jurisdiction.

Mid-State Trust, IV v. Randall W. Swift
01A01-9703-CV-00145
Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis
Trial Court Judge: Judge Leonard W. Martin

This is an appeal by defendant/appellant, Randall W. Swift, from the decision of the Cheatham County Circuit Court dismissing his appeal from the general sessions court. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows

Shirley Jean McCracken and Alan McCracken, et. al., v. Brentwood United Methodist Church
01A01-9511-CV-00531
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Cornelia A. Clark

This appeal involves a woman who broke both ankles in a fall at church. The woman and her husband filed suit in the Circuit Court for Williamson County against the church and others. The trial court granted the church’s motion for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations and the joint enterprise rule.The woman and her husband perfected this appeal after obtaining post-judgment relief from an inappropriate interlocutory appeal. We have determined that the trial court properly granted the post-judgment relief but erred in summarily dismissing the complaint.

Tom Milligan and wife Louise Millgan v. Curtis George and wife Wilma George
01A01-9609-CH-00406
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert E. Corlew, III

This interlocutory appeal involves a boundary line dispute between neighbors who live along Wilmouth Creek in Cannon County. Following inconclusive litigation between two of their neighbors, the owners of one of the tracts filed a boundary line action in the Chancery Court for Cannon County against the owners of one of the adjoining tracts that had been involved in the earlier litigation. The defending landowners moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the decision in the earlier litigation was res judicata as to the plaintiff landowners’ claims. The trial court denied the motion but grante permission to seek an interlocutory appeal. We granted the application for permission to appeal and now affirm the denial of the motion to dismiss because the parties in this case and the former case are not the same.