Barbara Jean McCall v. Kevin Green
This is an action where Kevin Green seeks to change custody of his son, Zachary Green, from Zachary's mother, Barbara Jean McCall. We find an order entered contended by Ms. McCall to be an agreed order was not in fact an agreed order, nor a valid one. We further find that the Trial Judge should have recused herself. We accordingly vacate the purported agreed order and direct that the Trial Judge recuse herself and another Judge be appointed by the Administrative Office of the Courts. |
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
John Doe, et al., v. Mama Taori's Premium Pizza, LLC, et al.
This appeal arises out of homosexual conduct in the workplace between an adult employee and a sixteen-year-old, part-time employee. After the adult employee was arrested and charged with statutory rape and contributing to the delinquency of a minor, the minor employee and his parents filed suit in the Circuit Court for Sumner County seeking damages from the adult employee and the owner of the restaurant where the minor employee and the supervisor had worked. The restaurant denied liability and among its affirmative defenses asserted the defense of consent with regard to the minor's claims and the defense of comparative fault with regard to the claims of the minor's parents. The trial court denied the minor's and his parents' motions to strike these defenses but granted the minor and his parents permission to apply for an interlocutory appeal. We granted the interlocutory appeal and now hold that the trial court correctly denied the motions to strike the restaurant's defenses. |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
South Harpeth Farms, et al., v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, et al.
The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals granted a special use exception to the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County for the construction of a tower for a new emergency response system. The appellants, South Harpeth Farms, LLC, James A. Webb, III and William H. Freeman appeal the trial court's order. The trial court held that the granting of the special use exception was supported by material evidence and that the Board of Zoning Appeals did not act illegally, arbitrarily or fraudulently. The appellants appeal on the grounds that: (1) The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County was not a proper applicant for a special use exception under the Metropolitan Zoning Regulations; (2) the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County misrepresented to the Board of Zoning Appeals that the proposed site for the project was the only possible location for the radio tower; and (3) the Board of Zoning Appeals arbitrarily and capriciously granted the special use exception in the absence of any material evidence to support its decision. We affirm the decision of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Donna Roxbury Breeding (Henson) v. Kenny Frank Breeding
This is post-divorce custody dispute. In the original divorce decree, the mother was awarded custody of the parties' two minor children. Subsequently, when the mother was required to undergo brain surgery, the mother and father agreed, and the trial court ordered, that the father would have custody of the children until each child reached the age of twelve, at which point the child would decide with which parent he wished to live. After recovering from the surgery, the mother filed a petition to change custody citing, inter alia, the children's desire to live with her and the children's worsening behavior, which included running away from the father's home. The trial court denied the mother's petition, finding no material change in circumstances warranting a change of custody. From this order, the mother now appeals. We reverse and remand, finding that the trial court applied the incorrect standard in light of the prior agreed order. |
Giles | Court of Appeals | |
Joanne Dickey, et vir., v. W. Keith McCord, et al.
This is a personal injury action arising from a boating accident in the Bahamas. At trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiffs appealed, alleging that the jury's verdict was not supported by any material evidence as well as alleging error with the trial court's function as thirteenth juror and with its evidentiary rulings concerning an expert witness and admission of testimony concerning non-use of life preservers by the plaintiffs. We affirm.
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Philip Workman v. Donal Campbell, et al.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
State Farm Ins. Co. vs. Charles Schubert, et al
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
The Weather Doctor Services Co., Inc., vs. Mark Stephens, et al
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Bobby King vs. City of Gatlinburg
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Darrell Smith vs. Chattanooga Medical Investors, Inc. d/b/a Life Care Center Chattanooga
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: T. M. & M.M. vs. Department of Children's Svcs
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Jennifer Gregg vs. Shirley McKay, Diane Farley, and Michael Floyd
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Anna Williams vs. James Williams, II
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Audie Lowe, et al vs. Bill Goad, et al
|
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
Randall B. Coward vs. Blount County
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Allied Sound, Inc. vs Eddie Neely & Johnny Davis
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
E2000-01095-R3-CV
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Blanche Bunch vs. Robert Sharp
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
Jack Hutter, vs. Robert Cohen & John Hutter vs. Allen Bray
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Jack Hutter, vs. Robert Cohen & John Hutter vs. Allen Bray
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Jack Hutter, vs. Robert Cohen & John Hutter vs. Allen Bray
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Jack Hutter, vs. Robert Cohen & John Hutter vs. Allen Bray
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Loreta MCCollum, et al vs. James Connatser
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Steven Hull vs. Susan Hull and Garth Eddy
|
Jefferson | Court of Appeals | |
James Crawford vs. Ray Thomason, et al
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals |